JSR VS Open-Registry

Compare JSR VS Open-Registry and see what are their differences

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

JSR

Open-source package registry supports TypeScript and distributes as ECMAScript modules, works with all JS runtimes like Node.

Open-Registry

JavaScript Package Registry funded, developed and maintained by the community, for the community

Not present

Landing page //
2020-03-31

Open-Registry

Website: open-registry.dev

Edit details

JSR features and specs

Professional Networking
JSR provides a platform for professionals to network with other individuals in the industry, which can lead to collaborations, partnerships, and business opportunities.
Knowledge Sharing
Users can share insights, articles, and updates about the latest trends and technologies, fostering a community of knowledge exchange.
Event Updates
The platform offers updates on industry events, conferences, and workshops, allowing users to stay informed and participate in relevant opportunities.
User-Friendly Interface
JSR.io boasts a user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate, making it accessible for users of various technical backgrounds.

Possible disadvantages of JSR

Limited User Base
As a specialized platform, JSR may have a smaller user base compared to larger professional networks, potentially limiting networking opportunities.
Niche Focus
The focus on a specific industry or sector might not appeal to professionals outside of that niche, reducing its relevance for some users.
Cost of Premium Features
Access to certain advanced features or premium content may require a subscription or payment, which can be a barrier for some users.
Content Moderation
Ensuring the quality and accuracy of shared content can be challenging, and misinformation or low-quality posts might affect user experience.

Open-Registry features and specs

Decentralization
Open-Registry leverages decentralized technologies, which can increase reliability and reduce the single points of failure typically seen in centralized systems.
Cost Efficiency
By decentralizing package management, Open-Registry potentially reduces costs associated with maintaining central servers and infrastructure.
Security
The decentralized nature of the registry can enhance security by reducing the risk of malicious tampering through centralized servers.
Community Driven
Open-Registry is often driven by community contributions and development, encouraging more democratic and inclusive project evolution.

Possible disadvantages of Open-Registry

Adoption
Being a newer system, Open-Registry might struggle with wide adoption, as developers and organizations are often slow to move away from established tools.
Compatibility
Compatibility issues may arise, as legacy systems and tools are typically tailored to existing registries like npm, making integration potentially cumbersome.
Maturity
As a relatively newer project, Open-Registry may not yet have the robustness and maturity features of long-established registries.
Support
Open-Registry may have limited support resources compared to more established registry services, which could be a challenge for troubleshooting and help.

JSR videos

+ Add

Buku 200 Resep Sehat JSR oleh dr. Zaidul Akbar

Open-Registry videos

No Open-Registry videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JSR and Open-Registry)

Open-Registry

Front End Package Manager

50 50%

Front End Package Manager

50% 50

Package Manager

48 48%

Package Manager

52% 52

Windows Tools

48 48%

Windows Tools

52% 52

JavaScript Package Manager

44 44%

JavaScript Package Manager

56% 56

User comments

Share your experience with using JSR and Open-Registry. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JSR seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JSR mentions (5)

Introducing ts-base: A Modern TypeScript Library Template
// Node/Bun Import { add, getSecureRandomId } from "@your-package/ts-base"; // Browser (via bundler) Import { add, getSecureRandomId } from "@your-package/ts-base/browser"; // Deno (direct TypeScript imports) Import { add, greet, } from "https://jsr.io/@bgub/ts-base//src/index.ts";. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
We All Dodged a Bullet
To be fair, the advantage of Deno here is really the standard library that includes way more functionality than Node. But in the end, we should all rely on fewer dependencies. It's certainly the philosophy I'm trying to follow with https://mastrojs.github.io – see e.g. https://jsr.io/@mastrojs/mastro/dependencies. - Source: Hacker News / 25 days ago
NPM debug and chalk packages compromised
Worth mentioning... https://jsr.io/@std. - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago
Proposal for Standardized JSX
I like this — JSX is a little annoying to work with outside the major implementations. If this existed, I might not have found the need to make my little Hyperstatic library (https://jsr.io/@mdekstrand/hyperstatic). - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Malware found on NPM infecting local package with reverse shell
Deno is perhaps a better example with browser API's as part f winterTC + a growing set of std packages[1] and more importantly a security model that defends against this kind of exploit. I will agree with the sentiment though, I get not wanting to jump on new shiny things but for some reason I keep getting the vibe that the community is closer to crab mentality than conservatism and is downright hostile towards... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago