Satis VS Private Packagist

Compare Satis VS Private Packagist and see what are their differences

Flagsmith

Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Satis

Satis is a simple static Composer repository generator

Private Packagist

Composer package archive as a service for PHP

Landing page //
2023-07-11

Landing page //
2021-09-22

Satis

Website: github.com
Pricing URL: -
$ Details

Edit details

Private Packagist

Website: packagist.com
Pricing URL: Official Private Packagist Pricing
$ Details: -

Edit details

Satis features and specs

Custom Repository Creation
Satis allows you to create your own Composer repositories, which can host private or customized packages. This is useful for internal company projects or any situation where you want more control over the packages you use.
Simple Setup
Satis is relatively straightforward to set up and requires minimal configuration. This simplicity makes it accessible for teams without a dedicated DevOps department.
Lightweight
Being a simple PHP static file generator, Satis is lightweight and doesn’t require a large resource overhead to operate, making it efficient for smaller projects or limited server environments.
Secure Private Packages
Satis allows for the secure hosting of private packages, ensuring that internal or proprietary code is not exposed to the public and can be shared safely within an organization.
Composer Compatibility
Satis is fully compatible with Composer, ensuring that developers can seamlessly integrate it into their existing workflow without requiring significant changes or adaptations.

Possible disadvantages of Satis

Limited Feature Set
Satis is primarily a static file generator and does not offer advanced features such as package search, browsing, or user interfaces that more robust solutions might provide.
Manual Updates
Packages hosted on a Satis repository do not update automatically; it requires manual intervention to update the package listings whenever changes are made to the source packages.
No Dependency Management
Satis itself does not handle dependency management; it relies on Composer for that functionality. Satis is only for repository management, which might not suit all project needs.
Limited Scalability
While lightweight, Satis might not be ideal for large-scale operations or gigantic repositories with many dependencies and packages, as it doesn't inherently support scaling or load balancing mechanisms.
Lack of User Management
Satis does not offer built-in user management functionality, which means that any access restrictions or permissions need to be handled externally, potentially complicating integration with other systems.

Private Packagist features and specs

Centralized Package Management
Private Packagist offers a centralized platform to manage PHP dependencies, making it easier for organizations to control the distribution and versioning of their internal libraries and third-party packages.
Security
By using Private Packagist, organizations can ensure that their packages are coming from a secure and trusted source, reducing the risk of using malicious or compromised packages from public repositories.
Access Control
It allows users to assign access rights and roles to team members, which helps maintain security and ensures that only authorized personnel can manage and access specific packages.
Custom Domains
Organizations can use custom domains for their private packages, helping in maintaining brand identity and allowing for easier package management within the company's ecosystem.
Integrated with Composer
Private Packagist is natively integrated with Composer, the PHP dependency manager, ensuring seamless adoption and easy integration into existing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Private Packagist

Cost
Private Packagist is a paid service, which might not be ideal for smaller organizations or individual developers who have tight budget constraints.
Dependency on External Service
Relying on a third-party service for package management means that any downtime or service interruptions could potentially impact development workflows.
Complex Setup
Compared to using the default Composer setup, configuring and managing an additional platform might incur some initial complexity and a learning curve for development teams.
Limited to PHP
Being a PHP-focused service, it is not suitable for projects that require management of dependencies for multiple programming languages outside the PHP ecosystem.

Satis videos

+ Add

2002 Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 Initiale Road Test & Review - Matty's Cars

Private Packagist videos

+ Add

Interview - Private Packagist Nils Adermann, Mathias Schreiber

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Satis and Private Packagist)

Satis

Private Packagist

Package Manager

50 50%

Package Manager

50% 50

Software Development

54 54%

Software Development

46% 46

Developer Tools

53 53%

Developer Tools

47% 47

Code Collaboration

42 42%

Code Collaboration

58% 58

User comments

Share your experience with using Satis and Private Packagist. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Private Packagist might be a bit more popular than Satis. We know about 7 links to it since March 2021 and only 5 links to Satis. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Satis mentions (5)

Need help with Installing Enlightn Pro
Note: Satis is a local repo repository — the pro code is likely not on github. They set up their own system to handle these repositories outside of github/packagist. Source: over 2 years ago
Private Packagist - has anyone used and can tell me if it might fit in my scenario?
If you want/need to self-host this internally, you can look at satis to create and self-host a repository. Since you need to add the packages manually, your security team can vet the code before adding it. There is a post on gitconnected on how to set this up: https://levelup.gitconnected.com/how-to-host-your-own-private-packagist-for-free-or-extremely-cheap-faf44eca3647. Source: over 2 years ago
Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: almost 3 years ago
My own CMS/Tool - what is the best way to go about the usage in different projects?
My team and I use Satis to accomplish that. It's hosted on our servers and we can easily release new versions. Dependabot can even upgrade the dependencies if new ones are detected. Source: almost 3 years ago
Do you use a private composer registry ? (Why / Why Not)
Composer supports multiple types of custom respositories, so you can host your own repository (with something like Satis), pay for a packagist.com private repository or even use a VCS repository to fetch packages directly from your private GIT repos. Source: about 3 years ago

Private Packagist mentions (7)

Private Packagist - has anyone used and can tell me if it might fit in my scenario?
I was told in another forum to look at Private Packagist... But how is that different? Instead of installing packages from packagist.org.. You pay to Packagist.com to do the same thing? You just download from packagist.com cloud instead of packagist.org? Source: over 2 years ago
Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: almost 3 years ago
Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
Https://packagist.com maybe tell them about a local packagist install. Source: almost 3 years ago
Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
"[MANAGER] requested this to be done in PHP. You as IT will know that most modern programming and scripting languages work only with packaging software properly. Composer sends requests (majority of cases) to packagist.com and to github.com. It will add thousands of hours to do everything that composer does manually. Please sign here to authorize the usage of 4000 hours and the possible delay of 4000 hours.... Source: almost 3 years ago
What do you think of SaaS Frameworks?
Another downside that only really exists with non-PHP boilerplates is getting updates isn'T as easy. With PHP we're able to use packagist.com and make our code available via composer. Other languages don't have this so SaaS Pegasus provides zip downloads and Gravity provides access to a GitHub repo. This means you have to apply bug fixes yourself. With Parthenon, you do composer update and you'll get the latest... Source: almost 3 years ago