pre-commit by Yelp VS Fork

pre-commit by Yelp Reviews

Fork Reviews

pre-commit by Yelp mentions (142)

• Implementing Quality Checks In Your Git Workflow With Hooks and pre-commit

  # See https://pre-commit.com for more information # See https://pre-commit.com/hooks.html for more hooks Repos: - repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks rev: v3.2.0 hooks: - id: trailing-whitespace - id: end-of-file-fixer - id: check-yaml - id: check-toml - id: check-added-large-files - repo: local hooks: - id: tox lint name: tox-validation ... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Embracing Modern Python for Web Development

  Pre-commit hooks act as the first line of defense in maintaining code quality, seamlessly integrating with linters and code formatters. They automatically execute these tools each time a developer tries to commit code to the repository, ensuring the code adheres to the project's standards. If the hooks detect issues, the commit is paused until the issues are resolved, guaranteeing that only code meeting quality... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• EmacsConf Live Now

  Https://pre-commit.com/ can (and probably should) be used with any editor for such things. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• A Tale of Two Kitchens - Hypermodernizing Your Python Code Base

  Pre-commit Hooks: Pre-commit is a tool that can be set up to enforce coding rules and standards before you commit your changes to your code repository. This ensures that you can't even check in (commit) code that doesn't meet your standards. This allows a code reviewer to focus on the architecture of a change while not wasting time with trivial style nitpicks. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Things I just don't like about Git

  Ah, fair enough! On my team we use pre-commit[0] a lot. I guess I would define the history to be something like "has this commit ever been run through our pre-commit hooks?". If you rewrite history, you'll (usually) produce commits that have not been through pre-commit (and they've therefore dodged a lot of static checks that might catch code that wasn't working, at that point in time). That gives some manner of... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Fork mentions (84)

• My Personal Serverless Rust Developer Experience. It’s Better Than You Think

  Finally, I didn't mention source code control. That topic is very personal to people. I don't tend to use my IDE for managing Git. I like to use something external that gives me a "best-in-breed" solution. That tool for me is Fork. I've shared this tool before, but never in an article. If you are like me and enjoy something visual and easy to work with, Fork fits those requirements. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• GitUI

  My favorite got GUI is Fork: https://git-fork.com/ It supports drag and drop for several operations including merge, rebase, and stage/unstage (and probably more). - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• When to refactor code

  They have a free trial to see if you like it: https://git-fork.com/. Source: 5 months ago

• Ask HN: Can we do better than Git for version control?

  As the OP, along what axis do you want the VCS to be "better" than git? git's cli user interface is monstrous (yes, I know, you personally have 800 cli commands memorized and get them all right every time, that doesn't make it "good"). From the outset, the maintainers of got basically decided "it's too much work to make all the cli flags behave and interact consistently" so they didn't. This allowed git to grow... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• The Scariest Thing Happened to Me Today--Now I'm Scared to Use Git Again

  Take a look at Fork. It's a really nice visual representation of repositories, commits, merges even merge conflicts can be solved within a really clean UI. Highly recommend. Source: 5 months ago