Table of contents
User Interface
Fork provides a clean, intuitive, and visually appealing user interface which makes it easier for users to navigate and manage their repositories.
Performance
The application is optimized for speed and performance, ensuring smooth and quick operations even with large repositories.
Comprehensive Features
Fork offers a wide array of features such as a built-in merge conflict resolver, interactive rebase, and support for Git Flow, making it a powerful tool for advanced Git users.
Cross-Platform Support
Fork is available for both Windows and macOS, allowing users to have a consistent experience regardless of their operating system.
Regular Updates
The developers of Fork actively maintain and update the software, frequently adding new features and fixing bugs to improve user experience.
Promote Fork. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Fork is considered a good choice for both individual developers and teams who need a robust and user-friendly Git client. Its blend of powerful features and ease of use caters well to both beginners and experienced Git users.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Fork is good.
Check the traffic stats of Fork on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Fork on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Fork's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Fork on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Fork on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
✨ Super simple — perfect for visual thinkers, right? Download: https://git-fork.com/. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Try Fork, it's still obviously git, but it's the easiest I've found so far: https://git-fork.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Agreed. I’d pay for this (I pay for [Fork][1]), but never as a subscription. [1]: https://git-fork.com. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
I find the GitHub Desktop tool to be rather clunky. I use git in various ways; * CLI for most small tasks * GUI for big tasks and getting an overview * Editor UI for small things if I am currently in the editor. * GitHub’s website for collaboration and GH specific tasks The GUI’s I use are: Git-Fork on macOS, Windows. Visually my favorite UI of all. https://git-fork.com Sublime Merge on macOS, Windows and Linux.... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Git Fork: a git client with a similar level of polish to Tower, but as a one-time purchase instead of a subscription product. https://git-fork.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
I do most of my "git"ing on the command line, but sometimes I need a graphical user interface (GUI) to really understand what's going on. When I need that, I reach for Fork. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Finally, I didn't mention source code control. That topic is very personal to people. I don't tend to use my IDE for managing Git. I like to use something external that gives me a "best-in-breed" solution. That tool for me is Fork. I've shared this tool before, but never in an article. If you are like me and enjoy something visual and easy to work with, Fork fits those requirements. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
My favorite got GUI is Fork: https://git-fork.com/ It supports drag and drop for several operations including merge, rebase, and stage/unstage (and probably more). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
They have a free trial to see if you like it: https://git-fork.com/. Source: almost 2 years ago
As the OP, along what axis do you want the VCS to be "better" than git? git's cli user interface is monstrous (yes, I know, you personally have 800 cli commands memorized and get them all right every time, that doesn't make it "good"). From the outset, the maintainers of got basically decided "it's too much work to make all the cli flags behave and interact consistently" so they didn't. This allowed git to grow... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Take a look at Fork. It's a really nice visual representation of repositories, commits, merges even merge conflicts can be solved within a really clean UI. Highly recommend. Source: almost 2 years ago
I prefer GUIs simply because they let me see several things at once with a window split up into panes without having to multiplex or tile terminals. It can’t just be any UI though, that I’m particular about. My favorite used to be the native GitHub client for Mac, but when GitHub abandoned that and replaced it with a much worse cross platform I switched to Fork[0] which has been excellent and even has a native... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Fork - Price: $49 (one-time purchase) Git client for Mac that features a user-friendly interface and powerful features. Source: about 2 years ago
For a full GUI I really like https://git-fork.com/, but I find myself using it less and less lately. Source: over 2 years ago
I always feel like the main issue with tools like that is that you'll then just have to learn a separate syntax that's not portable and will be even harder to find instructions for. I usually prefer GUI tools for Git and https://git-fork.com is my favorite. I'd tell someone to use a tool like that and just use the subset of operations they feel comfortable with instead of a new wrapper tool. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Git fork: https://git-fork.com/ Best git client i’ve tried, even though I hate it’s tabbing system. RemedyBG: https://remedybg.itch.io/remedybg Excellent debugger for Windows. Sublime Text: To this day I have not found any text editor that works better than this. 100% worth the money. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
If you prefer a UI to use git (the command line tool to interact with GitHub) I'd recommend using Fork. (SourceTree is also quite good; GitHub Desktop is a bit too minimal for my taste). Source: over 2 years ago
I have done complex cherry picks, rebases, reverts, and some batshit merge conflict resolutions (that never should have happened in the first place) thanks to fork. Source: over 2 years ago
Have to recommend git fork (https://git-fork.com/). I've tried a ton of git guis and find this both 1) the best one and 2) one of the few without subscription pricing. Plus it's non electron, native software. A must use for me. Source: over 2 years ago
Https://git-fork.com/ (when not cmd-lining). Source: over 2 years ago
No mentions of Git-Fork? Damn good git GUI (windows version available too), easy to use and "free evaluation" that shows only a pop-up, can be used forever. Source: over 2 years ago
Fork, a Git client, has garnered a substantial following and significant interest in the software development community. Its key features and user experiences position it as a notable player among Git tools.
Highlighted Features and User Experiences
One of Fork's standout features is its tab-based navigation, which affords users the ability to organize their various Git management tasks efficiently. This design choice is praised for improving workflow visibility, allowing for more intuitive management of open repositories and tasks. Additionally, Fork enables users to open their apps or websites directly within the tool, a feature seen as highly convenient for tracking repository-related outcomes.
Fork also emphasizes ease of use, which appeals to both seasoned developers and those newer to complex Git operations: Several comments commend Fork for its user-friendly interface that makes navigating Git's typically steep learning curve more manageable. The "drag-and-drop" functionality, which simplifies complex operations such as merging and rebasing, is frequently mentioned as a highly intuitive tool within Fork's UI.
Pricing and Reception
Fork is recognized for offering a polished interface comparable to other high-quality Git clients like Tower but differs significantly by being available as a one-time purchase rather than a subscription model. Many users are particularly appreciative of this pricing strategy, which contrasts the trend towards ongoing subscription fees prominent with other tools.
Competitive Landscape
In the realm of Git GUIs, Fork competes against several noteworthy alternatives such as GitKraken, GitHub Desktop, SmartGit, SourceTree, TortoiseGit, tig, and Sublime Merge. Many users report favoring Fork over other options, citing its visual appeal and operational efficiency.
GitHub Desktop and SourceTree, while popular, are sometimes criticized for being less comprehensive or too minimal, which could contribute to users opting for Fork instead. Meanwhile, Sublime Merge often accompanies Fork for certain users thanks to its strong feature set; however, it may not align as well with all developers' thought processes as Fork does.
User Community and Feedback
Overall, the discourse around Fork is predominantly positive. Developers frequently recommend the tool in forums and software development discussions for its balance of powerful features and an approachable interface. Its utility for both simple tasks and complex operations, coupled with robust cross-platform support on macOS and Windows, solidifies Fork’s reputation as a preferred Git GUI for many in the software development community.
This consistent positive feedback illustrates Fork's ability to fulfill the needs of its varied user base effectively, securing its position as a strong choice in an environment crowded with competitive Git tools.
Do you know an article comparing Fork to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Fork good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Fork here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
