Software Alternatives & Startups

Portmap.io VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Portmap.io VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Portmap.io

Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

Rating
1.0 · 1 review
Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Portmap.io seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 34 links to Portmap.io, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github.

social mentions
34 vs 1
Localhost Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
78 vs 87

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Portmap.io
Commit Together by Github
Website portmap.io github.blog
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Portmap.io 5 features
Commit Together by Github 4 features
  • Ease of Use
    Portmap.io offers a simple interface that makes it easy for users to set up port forwarding without needing advanced networking knowledge.
  • Flexibility
    The service supports multiple tunneling protocols including OpenVPN and SSH, providing versatility depending on user needs.
  • Cost-effective
    Portmap.io offers both free and paid plans, allowing users to choose a service level that fits their budget while still providing essential features.
  • Compatibility
    The service is compatible with various operating systems, making it accessible to a wide range of users.
  • No Need for Static IP
    Users can access their internal services over the internet without requiring a static IP address.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Bandwidth
    The free plan has bandwidth limitations that may not be suitable for high-traffic applications.
  • Security Concerns
    Using port forwarding services can introduce security risks if not properly configured or if the service has vulnerabilities.
  • Reliability
    As with many online services, there can be downtime or maintenance periods which may affect service availability.
  • Dependency on Third-party Service
    Relying on an external service for port forwarding can be a disadvantage if the service experiences issues or discontinues.
  • Configuration Limits
    Advanced users might find the configuration options somewhat limited compared to setting up port forwarding manually on their own networks.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Portmap.io
Commit Together by Github

Overall verdict

  • Portmap.io is generally considered a good tool for its ease of use, reliability, and features such as SSL support and a user-friendly interface. However, users should be aware of potential security risks when exposing local services to the public internet.

Why this product is good

  • Portmap.io is a popular choice for users looking to expose local servers to the internet without dealing with complex network configurations like port forwarding. It provides a straightforward solution for developers wanting to test, share, or access services remotely.

Recommended for

    Developers, system administrators, and hobbyists who need to access local services remotely or those testing webhooks and other remote internet applications.

No analysis of Commit Together by Github yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Portmap.io 3 videos + Add
Commit Together by Github 0 videos + Add

Port Forward without Router using portmap.io

More videos

  • - portmap.io portforwarding with Android FUD RAT live practical hindi
  • - NJRAT LimeRAT Portmap.io - free port forwarding solution NJRAT LimeRAT

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Portmap.io
Commit Together by Github
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Portmap.io and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Portmap.io 1.0 · 1 review
Commit Together by Github no reviews yet
  • WORST SERVICE i ever see
    SaaSHub review
    · Jun 2020

    Did not worked at all. No VPN connections, NO ssh connections... Did not work at all. No option to connect. Not working in my country and "No refund" :( I got fooled with such fake service. NOT RECOMMENDING. use ngrok...

We have no reviews of Commit Together by Github yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Portmap.io 34 mentions
Commit Together by Github 1 mention
  • How do hackers hide their ip in reverse shells?
    I once used portmap.io for reverse shell in ethical hacking classes. Source: about 3 years ago
  • OpenVPNnot working and i dont know what to do
    So I use portmap.io for OpenVPN like I saw in tutorials but I found out it is not working because my ip didn't change when I looked up what my ip was. Source: over 3 years ago
  • SSH into a personal computer in Jio Network using public IP
    I have a personal computer in the Jio Network at my home and I want to access it using ssh from another network. But in order to port forward my router I am stuck since Jio uses CGNAT if I am not mistaken and there is no use if I... Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Alternatives to Portmap.io and Commit Together by Github

When comparing Portmap.io and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products.