
Outgrow
Typeform
Survey Monkey
uberflip
Google Forms
SurveySparrow
Skyword
Joomag
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Outgrow
CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Outgrow. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Outgrow - Boost your marketing with highly interactive content. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
You can use a tool like Outgrow where you can create all such pieces using one single platform without having no-code knowledge. Source: about 3 years ago
Outgrow (polls, quizzes, surveys, assessments, chatbots, and calculators). Source: over 3 years ago
I stumbled upon outgrow.co which actually seems better. Source: about 4 years ago
I am trying to write a formula that works on a web form calculator from outgrow.co. I don't know PENDAS or anything remotely above basic algebra. Hoping someone here can help with this formula. T got as far as this (((Q1*Q2>=0)and(Q1*Q2<600))?(Q1*Q2)*1.50:0) but know this is wrong as it only accounts for under 600 SF. Source: over 4 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Typeform - Create beautiful, next-generation online forms with Typeform, the form & survey builder that makes asking questions easy & human on any device. Try it FREE!
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Survey Monkey - Create and publish online surveys in minutes, and view results graphically and in real time. SurveyMonkey provides free online questionnaire and survey software.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
uberflip - Organize and Centralize ALL of your Content in minutes
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.