
Typeform
Google Forms
Survey Monkey
Jotform
Qualtrics
Wufoo
Formstack
Paperform
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Typeform
CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Typeform should be more popular than Cppcheck. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Create a customer survey to collect insight on Typeform. Source: over 3 years ago
If it's feedback forms, you can simply use https://typeform.com/ and use conditions in the questions (e.g. If the User selected option X, show next question Y, etc.). Source: over 3 years ago
Its from typeform.com and it looks to be their own proprietary code, I couldn't see any specific libraries they were using. Source: almost 4 years ago
Not any social medias, not a single review on trustpilot, not a single piece of verifiable information that their thing is legit, nothing. And also the weird thing that I saw is when you go take their survey so they can take your commission, they sent you to a weird โtypeform.comโ link which apparently is a website that allowed them to have a web based platform they can use to create surveys without needing to... Source: almost 4 years ago
What is the best way to implement quite complex, personality surveys into a flutter app? It`d be perfect if I could directly integrate typeform (typeform.com) et al, but haven`t found anything yet, except to embed it in a webpage... Any other ideas? Source: about 4 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Google Forms - Simple web forms from Google.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Survey Monkey - Create and publish online surveys in minutes, and view results graphically and in real time. SurveyMonkey provides free online questionnaire and survey software.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Jotform - Free Online Form Builder & Form Creator
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.