Coverity Scan
SonarQube
Checkmarx
Veracode
HCL AppScan
Appknox
ReSharper
Klocwork
Cppcheck
SonarQube
Clang Static Analyzer
Parasoft C/C++test
PVS-Studio
lgtm.com
Polyspace
Flawfinder
Coverity Scan CppcheckNo Coverity Scan videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Coverity Scan. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
You can use Coverity for free on open source code. I use it on an app I open sourced for packet processing. https://scan.coverity.com/. Source: over 3 years ago
Scan.coverity.com — Static code analysis for Java, C/C++, C# and JavaScript, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
I personally remember Coverity Scan being completely offline for like 6 months while they tried to deal with infrastructure abuse from people mining bitcoin on their computing clusters. Source: almost 4 years ago
> Does anyone know any good static analysers other than gcc's or clang's? Visual C++ as well, because since the XP SP2 issues, Microsoft has come up with SAL, which you can also use on your own code, https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/code-quality/using-sal-annotations-to-reduce-c-cpp-code-defects?view=msvc-160 Then specialized tooling just for this purpose, just two examples, https://scan.coverity.com/... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: almost 2 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 2 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 2 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 2 years ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Checkmarx - The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Veracode - Veracode's application security software products are simpler and more scalable to increase the resiliency of your application infrastructure.
Parasoft C/C++test - Ensure compliance with a variety of functional safety, security, and coding standards in embedded C/C++ software.
HCL AppScan - Fast, Accurate, Agile Application Security Testing