Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

NativeScript VS Flutter

Compare NativeScript VS Flutter and see what are their differences

NativeScript

Build truly native apps with JavaScript

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Flutter

Build beautiful native apps in record time 🚀

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Tempreon
A personal memory layer for your AI tools, connected over MCP. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Flutter seems to be a lot more popular than NativeScript. While we know about 372 links to Flutter, we've tracked only 21 mentions of NativeScript.

social mentions
21 vs 372
Development Tools popularity
18% vs 82%
alternatives listed
187 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

NativeScript
Flutter
Website nativescript.org flutter.dev
Pricing
Open source
Open source
Listed in
Development Tools JavaScript Framework Javascript UI Libraries Developer Tools +1
Development Tools Application Builder Mobile App Development Cross-Platform Development +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

NativeScript 6 features
Flutter 5 features
  • Cross-Platform Development
    NativeScript allows developers to write code once and deploy it across multiple platforms, including iOS and Android, which saves time and resources.
  • Native Performance
    Since NativeScript directly uses native components, it delivers high performance comparable to native applications, unlike some other cross-platform solutions.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    NativeScript offers a rich ecosystem of plugins and modules, making it easy to extend functionalities and integrate with various services.
  • Single Codebase
    Maintaining a single codebase for both iOS and Android reduces development and debugging efforts.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, NativeScript has strong community support and continuous improvements driven by developers around the world.
  • Access to Native APIs
    NativeScript allows direct access to native APIs, giving developers more flexibility and control over platform-specific features.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The framework requires an understanding of native development concepts, which can be complex for new developers or those not familiar with mobile development.
  • Lack of Third-Party Components
    Compared to more mature frameworks, NativeScript has a limited number of third-party libraries and UI components available.
  • Performance Overhead
    Despite high performance, there is still some overhead compared to fully native applications due to the abstraction layer.
  • Limited Community Support
    Although the community is growing, it is still smaller compared to mainstream frameworks like React Native or Flutter, which might result in slower issue resolution and fewer resources.
  • Maintenance and Updates
    Keeping the framework and its plugins up to date with the latest iOS and Android releases can be challenging and resource-intensive.
  • Cross-Platform Development
    Flutter allows you to create applications that run on multiple platforms, including iOS, Android, web, and desktop, using a single codebase, thereby significantly reducing development time and effort.
  • Hot Reload
    The Hot Reload feature allows developers to see the results of their code changes almost instantly without a full restart, boosting productivity and making the debugging process more efficient.
  • Rich Set of Pre-Built Widgets
    Flutter offers a comprehensive collection of customizable widgets that follow modern design guidelines, allowing developers to build attractive and consistent UIs effortlessly.
  • Performance
    Flutter applications are compiled directly to native ARM code, which can result in superior performance comparable to native applications.
  • Strong Community Support
    As an open-source project, Flutter has a large and active community, providing abundant resources, third-party libraries, and plugins to accelerate development.

Possible disadvantages

  • Large App Size
    Flutter apps tend to have a larger file size compared to native apps, which could be a concern for users with limited storage space or slow internet connections.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    While Flutter is growing rapidly, its ecosystem is not yet as mature as those of more established frameworks, meaning that certain third-party libraries, tools, and plugins might be lacking or underdeveloped.
  • Platform-Specific APIs
    Despite its cross-platform capabilities, Flutter may require the development of custom platform-specific code for certain functionalities, which could complicate the development process.
  • Learning Curve
    Flutter uses Dart, a programming language that is less commonly used compared to JavaScript, Java, or Swift, which may result in a steeper learning curve for new developers.
  • State Management Complexity
    Managing states effectively in large applications can be challenging in Flutter, potentially leading to convoluted code if not handled properly.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

NativeScript
Flutter

Overall verdict

  • NativeScript is considered a good choice for developers seeking to create cross-platform mobile applications with a native look and feel while using web technologies they are already familiar with. It balances the flexibility of web development with the performance and capability of native apps.

Why this product is good

  • NativeScript is a popular open-source framework for building native mobile applications using JavaScript, TypeScript, Angular, Vue.js, or Svelte. It allows developers to write and maintain a single codebase for both iOS and Android, which can significantly reduce development time and effort. NativeScript provides access to native APIs, ensuring that apps can leverage device capabilities to deliver a truly native user experience. Additionally, the community and plugin ecosystem offer resources and tools to enhance app functionality and streamline development processes.

Recommended for

  • Web developers looking to leverage their existing skills to build mobile apps.
  • Teams that need to maintain a single codebase for multiple platforms.
  • Projects that require deep integration with native device features.
  • Developers familiar with frameworks like Angular, Vue.js, or Svelte who want to build mobile applications.

Overall verdict

  • Flutter is generally considered to be a good framework, particularly for developers who prioritize building cross-platform applications with a consistent look and feel across devices. Its performance is comparable to native applications, and its flexibility and ease of use make it a worthy choice for both beginners and experienced developers.

Why this product is good

  • Flutter is a UI toolkit developed by Google that allows developers to create natively compiled applications for mobile, web, and desktop from a single codebase. Its primary strengths include fast development cycles enabled by features like hot reload, a rich set of pre-designed widgets that follow Google's Material Design guidelines, and its use of Dart language which offers excellent performance. Furthermore, Flutter has a strong community and backing by Google, ensuring regular updates and long-term support.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to create applications for multiple platforms from a single codebase.
  • Those who appreciate material design and need a rich set of customizable widgets.
  • Teams that value rapid iteration and hot reload features for quicker testing and updates.
  • Projects that require good community support and regular updates from a major tech company.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

NativeScript 3 videos + Add
Flutter 1 video + Add

NativeScript VS React Native 2019 | performance | community | plugins

More videos

  • - Which one is best for you? Flutter, React Native, Ionic or NativeScript?
  • - 7 Things to Know When Learning NativeScript

beginning of flutter youtube channel

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
NativeScript
Flutter
18% 18%
Development Tools
82% 82%
35% 35%
JavaScript Framework
65% 65%
21% 21%
Developer Tools
79% 79%
100% 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using NativeScript and Flutter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

NativeScript no reviews yet
Flutter no reviews yet

View more

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

NativeScript 21 mentions
Flutter 372 mentions

View more

  • Sandbox#1: Flutter Application Design First Steps
    Let start another chapter of this journey with Dart by creating a mobile application with Flutter. For this post, a really simple application will be created called sandbox. Instead of adding some interactive part, like sending/receiving... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Gemma-San — A Teacher in Every Pocket.
    Built with Flutter + flutter_gemma 0.15.1 + Whisper.cpp + sqflite. Targets 4–6 GB RAM Android phones like the Tecno Spark 10 and Infinix Hot 30 — the phones African kids actually share with their families. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • AI-Native Mobile Device Automation: Give Your AI Agent Eyes and Hands on Real Phones
    For apps with custom-rendered UIs — React Native, Flutter, games — where the accessibility tree is sparse, MobAI offers an OCR fallback that returns recognized text with tap coordinates. The agent always has something to work with. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

View more

Alternatives to NativeScript and Flutter

When comparing NativeScript and Flutter, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...