Table of contents
NativeScript
Build truly native apps with JavaScript.
As NativeScript is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Pricing:
- Open Source
Cross-Platform Development
NativeScript allows developers to write code once and deploy it across multiple platforms, including iOS and Android, which saves time and resources.
Native Performance
Since NativeScript directly uses native components, it delivers high performance comparable to native applications, unlike some other cross-platform solutions.
Rich Ecosystem
NativeScript offers a rich ecosystem of plugins and modules, making it easy to extend functionalities and integrate with various services.
Single Codebase
Maintaining a single codebase for both iOS and Android reduces development and debugging efforts.
Open Source
Being open source, NativeScript has strong community support and continuous improvements driven by developers around the world.
Access to Native APIs
NativeScript allows direct access to native APIs, giving developers more flexibility and control over platform-specific features.
NativeScript is considered a good choice for developers seeking to create cross-platform mobile applications with a native look and feel while using web technologies they are already familiar with. It balances the flexibility of web development with the performance and capability of native apps.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if NativeScript is good.
Check the traffic stats of NativeScript on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of NativeScript on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of NativeScript's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of NativeScript on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about NativeScript on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
NativeScript is a good example of a runtime built specifically for cross-platform native mobile application development built using JavaScript. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
A long time ago, nativescript[1] seemed to be a strong alternative to reactnative. Is that still the case? [1] https://nativescript.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
I'm curious about this topic as well. I would also add NativeScript[1] in the comparison. [1] https://nativescript.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
This is not so much the Svelte equivalent of React Native as it is just NativeScript (https://nativescript.org). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
There is also https://nativescript.org/ which would allow you to use Vue (or several other frameworks) to build a mobile app. Used it myself a while back for an iPad app using Vue 2 and it was pretty straightforward. It seems like there have been quite a few improvements since then so might be worth a look. Source: about 2 years ago
Anyone who thinks this sucks should try NativeScript with hassle-free update experience, quick build time, HMR, direct access to native apis, use React Native plugins and more. Pick any style you like - vanilla, Angular, Vue, React, Svelte - and easily add some SwiftUI and Jetpack Compose views if you want a and connect it to your JS. Docs are a bit behind at the moment but a major update is in progress.... Source: over 2 years ago
There are layers that offer access to native APIs like capacitor, cordova and nativescript. Apparently sometimes multiple of them should be used, but I didn't understand what are the differences even after reading the announcement. These seem to be frontend agnostic technologies and Capacitor is apparently the more modern choice at the moment. Source: over 2 years ago
PWA? You can then, with moderate difficulty use something like https://nativescript.org/ make native versions. Source: over 2 years ago
Using the amazing Preview environment that the Nativescript team together with Stackblitz have done, it was time to start hacking at it. (More information can be found here at https://preview.nativescript.org/). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
There is something called NativeScript. Source: almost 3 years ago
Svelte Native leverages NativeScript, which allows you to develop native apps with JavaScript and gives the JavaScript code access to the device native code directly. It has no wrapper, meaning you can access all supported device APIs. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
Maybe https://nativescript.org/ is something for you? đ . Source: over 3 years ago
Writing JavaScript for the server-side is possible, also writing JavaScript for mobile applications and desktop applications is also possible. Apache Cordova is a free mobile application development framework that allows you to develop an application in HTML/JavaScript and then it wraps it into a native container that can access the device functions of several platforms and hence enables the web app to work on... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
NativeScript's vision is to âLiberate your development by using platform APIs directly without leaving your [love] of JavaScript.â Think of NativeScript as the go-to tool when building cross-platform mobile apps with JavaScript in a framework-agnostic team. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
JavaScript â> NativeScript Is what feels the most appealing to me. Source: almost 4 years ago
As mentioned before the NativeScript Playground has been great to get to grips with so far. Their docs have also been a great resource too. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
None of those! The real answer is Nativescript -- https://nativescript.org It doesn't get the buzz, and the ecosystem is somewhat old (it's surprisingly common to run into a repo that hasn't been touched in a year) but it's the superior platform to React Native and you get none of the capriciousness of the React ecosystem (if anything the Nativescript community might need a jolt). Nativescript is incredibly... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
React Native / NativeScript - for building native mobile apps with web technologies (deeper native bindings, without the use of WebView). - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
You should not mistake PWAs with desktop or native applications built with Electron.js or Nativescript though - they do only run on the browser's context and have no access to device specific APIs. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
There are multiple ways to develop applications for the android; you can go down the path of hybrid application development where flutter, react-native, or NativeScript are the most common contenders. Flutter uses Dart, whereas React Native and Native Script rely on JavaScript. Answering the question of hybrid vs native is out of the scope of this roadmap. This roadmap is focused on the native Android apps... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
NativeScript, a prominent player in the cross-platform app development landscape, has garnered attention for its capabilities and unique approach. Built to leverage JavaScript, TypeScript, Angular, and Vue.js, NativeScript is seen as a powerful tool that empowers developers to create truly native mobile applications across iOS and Android platforms from a single codebase. The overarching narrative within the tech community highlights both praise and room for growth, situating NativeScript as a compelling alternative to other cross-platform frameworks like React Native, Ionic, and Xamarin.
Native Performance and APIs: A central theme in recent discussions is the emphasis on NativeScript's ability to provide a truly native experience. By directly accessing native APIs and controls, it bridges the gap between hybrid and native development. Its capacity to deliver high-performance apps by leveraging native APIs makes it suitable for building sophisticated applications without the overhead typical of some hybrid frameworks like Apache Cordova or PhoneGap.
JavaScript and TypeScript Compatibility: The compatibility with popular web technologies such as JavaScript and TypeScript is frequently mentioned as a significant boon for developers familiar with these languages. Additionally, for those already comfortable with Angular or Vue.js, NativeScript presents a familiar environment, further easing the transition to mobile app development.
Single Codebase: The ability to maintain a single codebase for multiple platforms is highly valued. This feature is highlighted across various articles as it significantly reduces development time and the lines of code needed, making it more efficient for resource-limited teams or startups.
Framework Agnosticism: NativeScript's support for a wide range of frameworksâincluding Angular, Vue, React, and even Svelteâoffers flexibility that appeals to a diverse array of developers. Its flexibility is cited as a major draw compared to more opinionated ecosystems like Flutter or React Native.
Ecosystem and Documentation: While NativeScript is praised for its technical prowess, there are concerns about its ecosystem, particularly regarding the pace of updates and the availability of current documentation. These aspects can pose challenges for developers looking for cutting-edge community support and resources.
Market Presence and Adoption: NativeScript sometimes suffers from a lower market profile compared to React Native and Flutter. Although regarded highly by some of its users, it doesn't consistently command the same level of buzz or mainstream adoption, possibly impacting its long-term viability in larger enterprise settings.
Integration with Modern Tools: Some updates and integrations are noted to be in progress, suggesting an evolving product attempting to keep pace with developer needs. This dynamism can be a double-edged swordâoffering potential for growth but also requiring developers to stay vigilant with changes.
Despite some ecosystem drawbacks, community members often laud NativeScriptâs focus on native app development without being bogged down by the complexities encountered with other frameworks. The general consensus among tech discussions is that while NativeScript may not yet have the extensive adoption of its competitors, it offers a streamlined and robust platform for developers seeking to exploit native capabilities using web technologies.
In summary, NativeScript maintains a niche, though respected, position in the cross-platform development arena, appreciated for its native performance and flexibility. It is a formidable choice for developers committed to leveraging JavaScript alongside native APIs, while those considering it must weigh the trade-offs between ecosystem maturity and technical benefits.
Do you know an article comparing NativeScript to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is NativeScript good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss NativeScript here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
