NANO Reviews

DebugTool Reviews

1. Ernesto Lasso

   · Design project manager at Sriservices · about 4 years ago
   Save time and deliver projects faster

   We work in an agency that develops websites mainly in WordPress, and regularly based on our experience over several years of working with multiple clients, we have discovered that one of the main problems between agency-client is communication, which often sometimes is tedious and fruitless, but now with the visual debugger is easy to point in the screen what needs to be changed and do it quickly. Also, we had a problem calculating how much our will cost our services for the customers according to the time spent on their projects but now with the "Time tracking" function, we can know exactly how much time was dedicated to the project and based on that invoice the client with greater certainty.

   I think this is a great solution for web designers that needs to clear all visual bugs of a website fast to deliver in less time and get more jobs quickly.

   🏁 Competitors: Webvizio, Atarim

   👍 Pros:    Easy to install|Very good money/value|Saves a ton of time

   👎 Cons:    New

NANO mentions (134)

• I Wasted 8 Years of My Life in Crypto

  Yep, that's what I thought nano had done: https://nano.org/en instant, fee's a fraction of a cent, I thought this was it, international payments that don't rely on visa/mastercard! And then it just went no where :\. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Crypto Had Its Chance

  Nano has been around for years now, instant, feeless transfers. Its useful, but nobody is using it. It gets spam attacked every bull run as well which suggests certain influences dont want it to ever take off. https://nano.org/en. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• [Winner's Thread # 86] Restored Faith in Humanity! Thank you!

  Hi /u/oroscor1! Congratulations! Can you make a Nano (https://nano.org/en) wallet so I can send you some coin? By using Nano we can avoid the high transaction fees of BitCoin and PayPal. Source: over 3 years ago

• Can a 51% attack allow attackers to “steal the identity” of a wallet and spoof the sender of a transaction?

  Nano’s network is validated through a Open Representative Voting (ORV) consensus mechanism. They have fallen victim to a 51% attack in the last and attackers were able to double spend funds. Is it possible for this same attack to allow the sender address of a transaction to be spoofed? Source: almost 4 years ago

• ELI5: Why wouldn’t a universal currency work?

  There’s a better decentralised digital currency now called Nano that aims to be a borderless, permissionless currency for the unbanked masses. Source: almost 4 years ago

DebugTool mentions (0)