Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

micro_httpd VS Eclipse Jetty

Compare micro_httpd VS Eclipse Jetty and see what are their differences

micro_httpd

micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Eclipse Jetty

Jetty is a highly scalable modular servlet engine and http server that natively supports many modern protocols like SPDY and WebSockets.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Netumo
Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Web And Application Servers popularity
5% vs 95%
alternatives listed
25 vs 123

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

micro_httpd
Eclipse Jetty
Website acme.com eclipse.org
Listed in
Security Web Browsers VPN Web And Application Servers +1
Web And Application Servers Web Servers Application Server Development Tools +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

micro_httpd 0 features
Eclipse Jetty 7 features

No features have been listed yet.

  • Lightweight
    Jetty has a small memory footprint and is designed to be lightweight, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments.
  • Embeddable
    Jetty can be embedded directly into applications, providing greater flexibility and allowing developers to manage the server from within their applications.
  • Scalable
    Jetty is capable of handling a large number of simultaneous connections, making it ideal for applications that require high concurrency and scalability.
  • Active Development
    Jetty is actively maintained and continuously updated, ensuring that it keeps up with the latest standards and security practices.
  • Support for WebSockets and HTTP/2
    Jetty includes built-in support for modern web protocols like WebSockets and HTTP/2, which can enhance performance and provide additional functionality.
  • Modular Architecture
    Jetty’s modular architecture allows developers to include only the needed components, further optimizing resource usage and performance.
  • Good Documentation
    Jetty offers comprehensive documentation and examples, making it easier for developers to get started and troubleshoot issues.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Because of its numerous features and configuration options, Jetty may have a steeper learning curve for newcomers compared to simpler server options.
  • Community Support
    While Jetty has a passionate user base, its community support may not be as extensive as more widely adopted solutions like Apache Tomcat.
  • Default Configuration
    Jetty’s default settings may not always be optimal for all use cases, requiring developers to spend additional time tweaking configurations for specific needs.
  • Limited Commercial Support
    Jetty has fewer commercial support options available compared to some other enterprise-level servers, which may be a concern for larger organizations.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For small or less complex projects, Jetty's feature set and capabilities may be overkill, leading to unnecessary complexity and overhead.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

micro_httpd
Eclipse Jetty

Overall verdict

  • micro_httpd is a solid, minimalist HTTP server that excels at simplicity and low resource usage, making it a good choice for lightweight, non-critical serving needs, though it lacks the features and performance of full-scale servers.

Why this product is good

  • Extremely small and simple codebase that is easy to audit and understand
  • Runs from inetd/xinetd, so it has essentially no memory footprint when idle
  • Handles basic static file serving, directory listings, and common MIME types
  • Free and open source from a reputable author (Jef Poskanzer of acme.com)
  • Portable and easy to compile on most Unix-like systems

Recommended for

  • Serving simple static websites or files with minimal overhead
  • Embedded systems or resource-constrained environments
  • Educational purposes and learning how a basic HTTP server works
  • Low-traffic internal or hobbyist projects that don't need advanced features
  • Situations where a lightweight server run via inetd/xinetd is preferred over a persistent daemon

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Eclipse Jetty is a robust and efficient server suitable for a wide variety of web applications. Its flexibility, performance, and support for modern web protocols make it a strong choice for developers who require a reliable and scalable web server.

Why this product is good

  • Eclipse Jetty is considered good for several reasons. It is lightweight, which makes it suitable for applications where memory and performance are critical. It supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP/2 and WebSocket, ensuring compatibility with modern web standards. Jetty is highly scalable and is often used in large-scale deployments. Its modularity allows developers to include only the components they need, reducing overhead.

Recommended for

  • Developers needing a lightweight and performance-oriented web server.
  • Applications requiring modern protocol support such as HTTP/2 and WebSocket.
  • Scalable applications that expect to handle a large number of simultaneous connections.
  • Projects that benefit from modular architecture, enabling custom configurations.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
micro_httpd
Eclipse Jetty
5% 5%
Web And Application Servers
95% 95%
100% 100%
Web Browsers
0% 0%
0% 0%
Application Server
100% 100%
100% 100%
Security
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using micro_httpd and Eclipse Jetty. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

micro_httpd no reviews yet
Eclipse Jetty no reviews yet

We have no reviews of micro_httpd yet. Be the first one to post

Alternatives to micro_httpd and Eclipse Jetty

When comparing micro_httpd and Eclipse Jetty, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...