Software Alternatives & Startups

Micro Focus LoadRunner VS Endtest

Compare Micro Focus LoadRunner VS Endtest and see what are their differences

Micro Focus LoadRunner

Micro Focus LoadRunner is the number one load testing tool for project teams.

Rating
0 reviews
Endtest

The agentic AI platform for end-to-end test automation.

Rating
4.5 · 2 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $175 / Monthly
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Endtest seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 8 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 8
Web Analytics popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
89 vs 158

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Micro Focus LoadRunner
Endtest
Website opentext.com endtest.io
Pricing —
Paid Free trial $175 / Monthly Official pricing
Platforms —
Browser Android iOS Web REST API Google Chrome Firefox Edge Safari Internet Explorer +7
Company — Startup from the United States · 20 - 49 employees · 2016
Listed in

About Micro Focus LoadRunner and Endtest

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Micro Focus LoadRunner
Endtest

No description of Micro Focus LoadRunner yet.

Endtest is an agentic AI platform for end-to-end test automation that helps teams create, run, maintain, and scale automated tests faster, without writing code. It combines a low-code testing interface with AI agents that can generate editable tests, assist with maintenance, import tests from...

Read more about Endtest

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Micro Focus LoadRunner 5 features
Endtest 15 features
  • Comprehensive Protocol Support
    LoadRunner Professional supports a wide range of protocols such as web, mobile, APIs, and more, allowing testers to simulate various user interactions across different application types.
  • Scalability
    LoadRunner can simulate a large number of users, making it suitable for performance testing enterprise-level applications and ensuring they can handle peak user loads.
  • Detailed Performance Metrics
    Provides in-depth insights and detailed performance metrics to identify bottlenecks and optimize application performance effectively.
  • Integration with Other Tools
    Seamlessly integrates with a variety of CI/CD, monitoring, and analysis tools, enhancing its usability and value in a DevOps environment.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    Offers robust and customizable reporting features that aid in communicating performance test results effectively to stakeholders.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity and Learning Curve
    The tool can be complex to set up and use, requiring a steep learning curve, particularly for users who are new to performance testing or LoadRunner specifically.
  • Cost
    LoadRunner Professional can be expensive, both in terms of licensing and operational costs, potentially making it less accessible for smaller teams or companies.
  • Resource Intensive
    The tool can be resource-intensive, requiring significant hardware and system resources, which might necessitate additional infrastructure investment.
  • Limited Open Source Support
    Compared to open-source alternatives, LoadRunner offers limited community-driven support, which could restrict access to community-contributed plugins or extensions.
  • UI/UX
    Some users find the user interface outdated or less intuitive compared to more modern performance testing tools, which might affect user experience.
  • AI Test Creation Agent
    Generate editable automated tests from plain-language instructions, files, or imported test definitions.
  • Codeless Test Automation
    Endtest allows users to create automated tests without writing any code, making it accessible to users with limited programming skills.
  • Cross-Browser Testing
    The platform supports cross-browser testing, allowing users to ensure their applications work on various browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • No-Code Test Automation
    Create, run, and maintain automated tests through an intuitive interface without writing code.
  • Self-Healing Tests
    Automatically recover from changed element locators to reduce broken tests and maintenance work.
  • Visual Testing
    Endtest offers visual testing capabilities which can automatically detect visual differences in the UI, helping to catch design-related issues.
  • Agentic AI Test Automation
    Use AI agents that can generate, adapt, and assist with automated tests across complex workflows.
  • AI Assertions
    Use AI to validate complex page content, behavior, or outcomes without writing detailed manual checks.
  • Email / SMS Testing
    Verify email and SMS flows such as signups, login codes, notifications, and confirmations.
  • PDF and File Testing
    Test file uploads, downloads, PDF content, and document-based workflows automatically.
  • Accessibility Testing
    Check applications for accessibility issues and help teams build more inclusive user experiences.
  • Geolocation Testing
    Run tests from different locations to validate localized content, regional behavior, and location-based flows.
  • Integration
    It supports integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI, streamlining the deployment pipeline.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for users to navigate and set up their tests.
  • Cloud-Based
    Being a cloud-based solution, Endtest allows users to execute tests without needing local infrastructure, improving scalability and flexibility.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Micro Focus LoadRunner
Endtest

No analysis of Micro Focus LoadRunner yet.

Overall verdict

  • Endtest is considered a good choice for teams seeking a reliable and straightforward test automation solution, particularly those who prefer a codeless approach. Its ease of use, combined with a robust feature set, makes it well-suited for various testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Endtest is a user-friendly, codeless test automation tool that allows testers to create and execute tests without having to write complex code. It supports a wide range of platforms and technologies, which makes it versatile for most testing needs. It also offers features such as built-in test data management, parallel test execution, and integrations with CI/CD tools for streamlined workflows.

Recommended for

    Endtest is recommended for QA teams who are transitioning from manual to automated testing, organizations that lack extensive coding expertise within their testing teams, and companies that need to automate tests across multiple platforms quickly and efficiently.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Micro Focus LoadRunner 0 videos + Add
Endtest 3 videos + Add

No Micro Focus LoadRunner videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Endtest Visual Testing

More videos

  • - Endtest Self-Healing Tests
  • - Endtest AI Test Creation Agent

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Micro Focus LoadRunner
Endtest
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
27% 27%
73% 73%

User comments

Share your experience with using Micro Focus LoadRunner and Endtest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Micro Focus LoadRunner no reviews yet
Endtest 4.5 · 2 reviews

We have no reviews of Micro Focus LoadRunner yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Micro Focus LoadRunner 0 mentions
Endtest 8 mentions

Tracking Micro Focus LoadRunner since Mar 2021.

  • Most CI Failures Are Environment Failures
    At Endtest, we have been working toward results that show the failed step, the surrounding logs, screenshots, and the information needed to investigate what happened. AI-assisted failure analysis can help suggest a likely cause, but it... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • The Framework Tax Is a Product Decision
    At Endtest, we have always believed that tests should remain human-readable and editable, even when AI helps create them. Features such as the AI Test Creation Agent are useful because they compress the tedious part without turning the... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • A Passing Browser Test Is Not an Explanation
    Whether you build your own stack or use a managed platform such as Endtest, the objective should be the same:. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

View more

Alternatives to Micro Focus LoadRunner and Endtest

When comparing Micro Focus LoadRunner and Endtest, you can also consider the following products.