Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache JMeter VS Micro Focus LoadRunner

Compare Apache JMeter VS Micro Focus LoadRunner and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache JMeter logo Apache JMeter

Apache JMeter™.

Micro Focus LoadRunner logo Micro Focus LoadRunner

Micro Focus LoadRunner is the number one load testing tool for project teams.
  • Apache JMeter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • Micro Focus LoadRunner Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-01

Apache JMeter features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache JMeter is free to use, reducing the overall cost of testing and allowing for significant customization by the community.
  • Extensibility
    JMeter is highly extensible with plugins, which can add additional functionalities and capabilities tailored to specific needs.
  • Strong Community Support
    Due to its long history and widespread usage, JMeter benefits from a large, active community that provides tutorials, plugins, and troubleshooting help.
  • Supports Various Protocols
    JMeter supports a wide range of testing protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, LDAP, JDBC, and JMS, making it versatile for different types of applications.
  • Continuous Integration
    JMeter can be easily integrated with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, enabling automated performance testing in the development pipeline.
  • Graphical Interface
    The graphical user interface (GUI) makes it easier for testers to design and configure testing scenarios without extensive programming knowledge.

Possible disadvantages of Apache JMeter

  • Resource Intensive
    JMeter can be resource-intensive, especially when simulating high loads, which may require substantial hardware to mimic real-world scenarios.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Despite its GUI, JMeter can be complex to learn and use effectively, especially for those who are new to performance testing.
  • Limited Reporting
    JMeter's built-in reporting capabilities can be somewhat limited, requiring additional tools or plugins for more advanced reporting and analysis.
  • Not Ideal for UI Testing
    JMeter is not suitable for front-end or UI testing, as it is primarily designed for performance and load testing of backend services.
  • Memory Consumption
    The GUI mode, in particular, can consume a significant amount of memory, impacting performance during large-scale tests.

Micro Focus LoadRunner features and specs

  • Comprehensive Protocol Support
    LoadRunner Professional supports a wide range of protocols such as web, mobile, APIs, and more, allowing testers to simulate various user interactions across different application types.
  • Scalability
    LoadRunner can simulate a large number of users, making it suitable for performance testing enterprise-level applications and ensuring they can handle peak user loads.
  • Detailed Performance Metrics
    Provides in-depth insights and detailed performance metrics to identify bottlenecks and optimize application performance effectively.
  • Integration with Other Tools
    Seamlessly integrates with a variety of CI/CD, monitoring, and analysis tools, enhancing its usability and value in a DevOps environment.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    Offers robust and customizable reporting features that aid in communicating performance test results effectively to stakeholders.

Possible disadvantages of Micro Focus LoadRunner

  • Complexity and Learning Curve
    The tool can be complex to set up and use, requiring a steep learning curve, particularly for users who are new to performance testing or LoadRunner specifically.
  • Cost
    LoadRunner Professional can be expensive, both in terms of licensing and operational costs, potentially making it less accessible for smaller teams or companies.
  • Resource Intensive
    The tool can be resource-intensive, requiring significant hardware and system resources, which might necessitate additional infrastructure investment.
  • Limited Open Source Support
    Compared to open-source alternatives, LoadRunner offers limited community-driven support, which could restrict access to community-contributed plugins or extensions.
  • UI/UX
    Some users find the user interface outdated or less intuitive compared to more modern performance testing tools, which might affect user experience.

Apache JMeter videos

Book Review - Master Apache JMeter - From load testing to DevOps

Micro Focus LoadRunner videos

No Micro Focus LoadRunner videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache JMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Web Analytics
57 57%
43% 43
Software Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Analytics
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache JMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache JMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner

Apache JMeter Reviews

Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2019 (Comprehensive List)
Apache JMeter is an open-source Java desktop application designed for load testing. It mainly focuses on web applications. This tool can also be employed for unit testing and limited functional testing.
Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2018 (Comprehensive List)
Apache JMeter is an open-source Java desktop application designed for load testing. It mainly focuses on web applications. This tool can also be employed for unit testing and limited functional testing.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Reviews

We have no reviews of Micro Focus LoadRunner yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache JMeter seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache JMeter mentions (2)

  • Java naming facts
    Before Jakarta EE there was Apache Jakarta which was effectively the group name for Java based projects within the Apache project. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Are servers multithreaded by default?
    If you remove Spring from the equation you need to build the servlets yourself (according to the Sevlet API). You probably package the servlets in a war-file (with some configuration files), the war-file can then be deployed in a servlet server (ie Tomcat,). The sevlet servser usually handles the thread pool and other resources (ie database connection pools) for you, so you "only" have to provide a servlet that... Source: almost 4 years ago

Micro Focus LoadRunner mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Micro Focus LoadRunner yet. Tracking of Micro Focus LoadRunner recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache JMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner, you can also consider the following products

locust - An open source load testing tool written in Python.

LinkTiger - Hunt down broken links on your website with our industry leading and powerful broken link checker tool. Broken links can negatively affect your user experience and rankings.”/> <!-- banner styles and script --> <link rel=

soapUI - SoapUI Pro is one of the most prominent API testing platforms around, allowing developers to quickly prototype the functions of their apps and get them to market with little hassle.

AT Internet - Transform your data into action with our powerful and flexible digital analytics solution.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Simple Analytics - The privacy-first Google Analytics alternative located in Europe.