Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Matomo VS VisualEditor

Compare Matomo VS VisualEditor and see what are their differences

Matomo

Matomo is an open-source web analytics platform

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
VE
VisualEditor

VisualEditor gives you the ability to edit without needing to learn wikitext markup, as is required by the default wikitext editor.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Grapple
Do-It-Yourself Data Analytics & Business Intelligence, Powered by AI sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Matomo seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 86 times since March 2021.

social mentions
86 vs 0
Analytics popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 23

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Matomo
VE
VisualEditor
Website matomo.org mediawiki.org
Pricing
Open source Official pricing
—
Company Startup from New Zealand —
Listed in
Analytics Web Analytics Open Source Privacy +1
Text Editors Website Design Rich Text Editor Content Marketing +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Matomo 6 features
VE
VisualEditor 5 features
  • Open Source
    Matomo is an open-source platform, allowing for customization and transparency in how data is collected and processed.
  • Data Ownership
    Users have full ownership of their data, ensuring that no third-party entities have access to sensitive information.
  • Privacy Compliance
    Matomo is designed with privacy in mind, making it easier to comply with GDPR, CCPA, and other data protection regulations.
  • Self-Hosting Option
    Matomo can be self-hosted, giving users complete control over their data security and server environment.
  • Feature-Rich
    The platform offers a wide range of features, including A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, and more.
  • Community Support
    A large community of users and developers contributes plugins, improvements, and support, enriching the ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup, especially for self-hosted versions, can be complex and time-consuming, requiring technical expertise.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Matomo, particularly its self-hosted version, can be resource-intensive, requiring significant server capabilities.
  • Cost for Advanced Features
    While the basic version is free, advanced features and cloud hosting come at a cost, which might be expensive for small businesses.
  • Limited Integrations
    Matomo offers fewer integrations with other marketing and analytics tools compared to some other platforms like Google Analytics.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may find the interface and advanced features challenging to learn and navigate initially.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report performance issues, particularly with large volumes of data or on less powerful servers.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    VisualEditor provides a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) interface, making it more accessible for users who are not familiar with wiki markup language.
  • Real-Time Editing Feedback
    Changes are immediately visible, allowing users to see how their edits will appear on the page without the need to preview separately.
  • Reduces Entry Barrier
    By simplifying the editing process, VisualEditor invites more contributors who might be intimidated by traditional editing methods.
  • Improved Accessibility
    It enhances accessibility for people with disabilities, as navigating and editing are more straightforward with the visual cues provided.
  • Consistent Style Guide
    Helps maintain a consistent style across articles by embedding templates and standard formats directly into the editing process.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance Issues
    VisualEditor can sometimes be slower to load and operate compared to the traditional wikitext editor, especially on large pages.
  • Limited Features
    While convenient, VisualEditor may lack some advanced features available in the traditional markup editor, restricting power users' capabilities.
  • Occasional Bugs
    As with any complex software, users may encounter bugs or glitches that disrupt the editing process.
  • Higher Resource Demand
    VisualEditor requires more computing resources, which can be problematic for users with older devices or slower internet connections.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Users
    Experienced users of the traditional editor might find transitioning to VisualEditor challenging due to different workflows and controls.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Matomo
VE
VisualEditor

Overall verdict

  • Matomo is a good choice for those who prioritize data privacy and require a comprehensive analytics tool that can be self-hosted. It's especially suitable for organizations hesitant about sharing data with third-party services and for those looking for customizable and transparent analytics solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Matomo is a popular open-source web analytics platform that provides in-depth insights into website traffic, user behavior, conversion rates, and more. It's considered a robust alternative to Google Analytics, with a focus on data privacy, as users can host the platform on their own servers or use Matomo's cloud-based service. Matomo offers features such as heatmaps, session recordings, goal tracking, and more, which can be particularly valuable for businesses looking to gain a detailed understanding of their website performance while maintaining control over their data.

Recommended for

  • Privacy-conscious businesses
  • Web developers
  • Data analysts
  • E-commerce sites
  • Organizations with in-house IT capabilities
  • Government and educational institutions
  • Non-profits looking for cost-effective solutions

Overall verdict

  • VisualEditor is a solid, mature WYSIWYG editing tool for MediaWiki that lowers the barrier to wiki editing by removing the need to learn wikitext syntax, making it a good choice for wikis wanting to attract and retain non-technical contributors, though experienced wikitext editors may still prefer the traditional source editor for complex tasks.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a what-you-see-is-what-you-get (WYSIWYG) interface, making editing intuitive for users unfamiliar with wikitext markup
  • Officially developed and maintained by the Wikimedia Foundation, ensuring long-term support and integration with MediaWiki core
  • Lowers the learning curve for new editors, which helps increase contributor participation on wikis like Wikipedia
  • Supports real-time preview of formatting, tables, templates, media, and references without needing to memorize syntax
  • Includes collaborative and accessibility-friendly features such as citation tools, link suggestions, and special character insertion
  • Allows seamless switching between visual and source (wikitext) editing modes
  • Actively developed with regular updates, bug fixes, and community feedback incorporated via Wikimedia's development process
  • Free and open-source, consistent with the MediaWiki ecosystem's licensing

Recommended for

  • New or casual wiki contributors unfamiliar with wikitext syntax
  • Wikimedia projects and communities aiming to lower barriers to entry for editors
  • Organizations running internal wikis who want a more user-friendly editing experience
  • Non-technical staff or subject-matter experts contributing content without needing markup knowledge
  • Wiki administrators seeking to increase editor retention and reduce onboarding friction
  • Users who prefer visual formatting tools similar to word processors over raw markup editing

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Matomo 5 videos + Add
VE
VisualEditor 1 video + Add

Matomo Analytics - Dashboards

More videos

  • - WP-Matomo (WP-Piwik) Review: Open Source Analytics For WordPress
  • - What are the differences between Matomo Analytics and Google Analytics
  • - AMU WEBD122 - Spohnholtz Piwik Analytics Review
  • - Matomo On-Premise installation overview

Side-by-side comparison of VisualEditor loading time

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Matomo
VE
VisualEditor
100% 100%
Analytics
0% 0%
0% 0%
Text Editors
100% 100%
100% 100%
Web Analytics
0% 0%
0% 0%
Content Marketing
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Matomo and VisualEditor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Matomo 5.0 · 1 review
VE
VisualEditor no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of VisualEditor yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Matomo 86 mentions
VE
VisualEditor 0 mentions

View more

Tracking VisualEditor since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Matomo and VisualEditor

When comparing Matomo and VisualEditor, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...