Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

lighttpd VS Haproxy

Compare lighttpd VS Haproxy and see what are their differences

lighttpd logo lighttpd

A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

Haproxy logo Haproxy

Reliable, High Performance TCP/HTTP Load Balancer
  • lighttpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-28
  • Haproxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-19

lighttpd features and specs

  • Low Memory Footprint
    Lighttpd is known for its low memory usage, making it ideal for environments where memory resources are limited.
  • High Performance
    It is designed to handle large numbers of parallel connections efficiently, making it suitable for high-traffic websites.
  • Easy to Configure
    Lighttpd offers straightforward configuration files that are easy to understand and modify.
  • Supports FastCGI, SCGI, and CGI
    It has built-in support for various interfaces like FastCGI, SCGI, and CGI, allowing it to interact with different types of applications.
  • Event-Driven Architecture
    The event-driven design allows for non-blocking and asynchronous operations, contributing to its speed and efficiency.

Possible disadvantages of lighttpd

  • Limited Module Support
    Lighttpd has fewer third-party modules and plugins compared to more popular web servers like Apache and Nginx.
  • Community Support
    The community around Lighttpd is smaller, which might result in slower updates and fewer tutorials or examples.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might find the initial setup and configuration challenging compared to more widely-used web servers.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Some applications or tools that are designed with Apache or Nginx in mind might not work seamlessly with Lighttpd.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    The development and release cycle for Lighttpd updates may not be as frequent as for more popular web servers.

Haproxy features and specs

  • High Performance
    HAProxy is known for its high efficiency and low latency, making it suitable for handling a large amount of traffic with minimal overhead.
  • Reliability
    The software is robust and stable, having been battle-tested in numerous large-scale environments, ensuring reliable performance under heavy loads.
  • Flexibility
    HAProxy supports a wide range of configurations, allowing it to be used in various scenarios, from simple load balancing to complex traffic routing.
  • Scalability
    With HAProxy, you can easily scale out your infrastructure by distributing the traffic across multiple servers, ensuring better resource utilization.
  • Health Checking
    HAProxy provides powerful health check mechanisms to monitor the status of backend servers and automatically remove unhealthy servers from the pool.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, HAProxy is free to use and has a community of contributors that help improve and maintain the software continuously.
  • SSL Termination
    HAProxy supports SSL termination, which can offload the SSL decryption process from backend servers, improving overall performance.
  • Logging and Monitoring
    HAProxy offers comprehensive logging and monitoring features that allow administrators to gain insights into traffic patterns and server health.

Possible disadvantages of Haproxy

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up HAProxy can be complex and may require a deep understanding of its configuration syntax and options, particularly for advanced use cases.
  • Lack of Built-in GUI
    HAProxy does not come with a built-in graphical user interface (GUI), which can make management more difficult for users who prefer visual tools over command-line interfaces.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    For beginners, the learning curve can be steep due to the advanced features and extensive configuration options provided by HAProxy.
  • Limited Application Layer Features
    While HAProxy excels at load balancing and basic traffic management, it lacks some application layer features that specialized application delivery controllers (ADCs) might offer.
  • Resource Intensive
    In certain high-traffic scenarios, HAProxy may consume significant CPU and memory resources, potentially requiring hardware upgrades.

Analysis of lighttpd

Overall verdict

  • Overall, lighttpd is a highly recommended choice for those needing a lightweight and efficient web server, especially where system resources are constrained.

Why this product is good

  • Lighttpd is often considered a good web server because it is designed to be fast, secure, and very lightweight. It effectively handles large volumes of traffic, supports important features like FastCGI, SCGI, Auth, Output Compression, URL Rewriting, and is highly configurable. Its asynchronous architecture allows it to serve multiple requests simultaneously, making it suitable for environments with high concurrency.

Recommended for

    Lighttpd is especially suited for situations where low resource usage is a priority, such as on embedded systems or servers with limited hardware capabilities. It is also useful for hosting static content, serving as a reverse proxy, or when hosting web applications with specific performance requirements.

Analysis of Haproxy

Overall verdict

  • Yes, HAProxy is considered good by many industry professionals due to its robustness, scalability, and flexibility. It is often used in production environments to ensure high availability and efficient distribution of network traffic.

Why this product is good

  • HAProxy is widely regarded as a highly reliable and efficient load balancer and proxy server. Its popularity stems from its ability to provide high availability, performance, and security. It is open-source, which allows for customization and wide adoption in various environments. HAProxy supports TCP and HTTP-based applications, making it versatile for different types of workloads.

Recommended for

  • Websites and applications with a high volume of traffic requiring load balancing
  • Organizations in need of reliable SSL termination and offloading
  • Businesses seeking enhanced security features like rate limiting, connection limiting, and DDoS protection
  • Teams that need a customizable and scriptable solution to fit complex network requirements

lighttpd videos

No lighttpd videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Haproxy videos

HAProxy Crash Course (TLS 1.3, HTTPS, HTTP/2 and more)

More videos:

  • Review - HAPROXY vs NGINX - 10,000 requests while killing servers
  • Tutorial - How To Setup ACME, Let's Encrypt, and HAProxy HTTPS offloading on pfsense

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to lighttpd and Haproxy)
Web And Application Servers
Web Servers
60 60%
40% 40
Application Server
100 100%
0% 0
Network & Admin
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using lighttpd and Haproxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare lighttpd and Haproxy

lighttpd Reviews

13 Best XAMPP Alternatives
Lighttpd is a simple and lightweight web server that allows you to do very fast static file serving. It can also be used as a content cache, a reverse proxy, or an HTTP accelerator. Lighttpd is not only lightning-fast but also straightforward to set up; in many cases, you only need one configuration file to work. Lighttpd has been around for some time now, so there are...
Source: thetechtian.com
Top 5 open source web servers
Great article Robin. Most of my experience is with Apache. I first started using it on Windows about 1998 or 1999. When I got into using Linux in 2001 I switched my previous install to that OS and have since deployed it many times. I have tried NGINX and lighttpd but never in production.
Source: opensource.com
Alternative web servers compared: Lighttpd, Nginx, LiteSpeed and Zeus
The huge leap for Lighttpd in January-March of 2007 is most likely due to one or more web hosting or domain registration companies switching over to Lighttpd either for their regular pages, or for parked pages, or both. If anyone knows what happened there in more detail, please feel free to let us know in the comments.
Source: www.pingdom.com

Haproxy Reviews

Top 5 Open Source Load Balancers in 2024
Widely regarded as a stalwart in the open source community, HAProxy has evolved into a versatile and powerful load balancing solution. HAProxy stands as a silent sentinel, orchestrating the seamless flow of data for some of the world's most visited websites. As a free, exceptionally fast, and reliable reverse-proxy, HAProxy is not just a load balancer; it's a digital maestro...
10 Awesome Open Source Load Balancers
HAProxy is an L4 and L7 load balancer supporting TCP and UDP traffic. It’s a well-established, open source solution used by companies such as Airbnb and GitHub. HAProxy is also a very capable L7 load balancer, supporting HTTP/2 and gRPC backends. Thanks to its long history, large community, and reliable nature, HAProxy has become the de facto open source load balancer—it...
10 Open Source Load Balancer for HA and Improved Performance
One of the popular ones out there in the market is to provide high availability, proxy, TCP/HTTP load-balancing. HAProxy is used by some of the reputed brands in the world, like below.
Source: geekflare.com
Top 5 Open-Source Load Balancers 2021
HAProxy provides many distinct features such as it processes an enormous number of tasks in a millisecond, offers minimal cost for context switch and memory usage, ability to instantly detect a threat or event on tens of thousands of connections, efficient use of the CPU cycles, and memory bandwidth, optimized timer queue, optimized HTTP header analysis, GZip Compression,...
Source: linuxways.net
The 5 Best Open Source Load Balancers
HAProxy is another common name in the web ecosystem. HAProxy offers reverse proxying and load balancing of TCP and HTTP traffic. When you choose HAProxy, you’re choosing a high-performance, well-established solution.
Source: logz.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Haproxy seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

lighttpd mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of lighttpd yet. Tracking of lighttpd recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Haproxy mentions (2)

  • HA Proxy For MySQL Master – Slave
    Root@haproxy01:~# haproxy -v HA-Proxy version 2.0.13-2ubuntu0.3 2021/08/27 - https://haproxy.org/ How to Install it? You simply use yum or apt commands to install it Sudo apt install -y haproxy. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • cannot get haproxy / mjpeg streamer to play nice together
    HA-Proxy version 2.2.9-2+deb11u3 2022/03/10 - https://haproxy.org/ maxconn 4096 user haproxy group haproxy daemon log 127.0.0.1 local0 debug Defaults log global mode http option httplog option dontlognull retries 3 option redispatch option http-server-close option forwardfor maxconn 2000 ... Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing lighttpd and Haproxy, you can also consider the following products

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Traefik - Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

SKUDONET - Scale easy and avoid system disruptions with the ADC challengers through high availability, load balancing, security and high performance.