
Appcues
UserGuiding
ShepherdJS
TourGuideJS
Userpilot
Usetiful
Userlane
Simple Javascript framework for adding screen tips

Year/Make/Model fitment search for Shopify. 8 verticals, Smart Parse, and your data in Shopify metaobjects — not a vendor database. Free tier, Pro at $49.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Intro.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 15 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | introjs.com | normalview.pro |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from Hungary | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Intro.js yet.
ViewForge is a Year Make Model (YMM) parts finder for Shopify. Shoppers pick their vehicle, machine or device from cascading dropdowns and see only the parts that fit. Fitment search works across eight verticals — auto, motorcycle, tractor, marine, power equipment, bicycle, printer and...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Intro.js: Onboard New Users with a Quick Wizard
More videos
ViewForge: YMM Search & Filter
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Intro.js and ViewForge.
ViewForge's answer:
Three things. (1) Data ownership: ViewForge writes fitment as Shopify metaobjects native to your store — most competitors store fitment in their own database. (2) 8 verticals out of the box: auto, motorcycle, tractor, marine, power equipment, bicycle, printer, electronics — most competitors are automotive-only. (3) Smart Parse: extract fitment automatically from your existing product titles and descriptions instead of re-typing everything.
ViewForge's answer:
Data ownership. Fitment lives in your Shopify metaobjects, so uninstalling does not take your compatibility data with it. Convermax, EasySearch and PartFinder all keep it in their own databases, and getting it back depends on their export tooling on the day you cancel.
Cost at the low end. The search widget, the compatibility table on the product page and the saved-vehicle garage are all on the free tier, up to 50 products, with no expiry. EasySearch puts the table and the garage behind its $75/month Premium plan. Convermax starts at $250/month.
Automotive and non-automotive coverage. Eight built-in templates, and fully custom templates from $19/month, for catalogs that do not decompose into Year/Make/Model at all.
ViewForge's answer:
Shopify merchants whose customers need to know whether a part fits before they will buy it — and who do not have an engineer on staff to build that themselves.
Concretely: auto and truck parts retailers, powersports and motorcycle dealers, tractor and agricultural parts sellers, marine and outboard suppliers, small-engine and power equipment stores, bicycle and e-bike component shops, printer supply merchants, and electronics accessory sellers.
Catalog sizes run from a few dozen products on the free tier up into the tens of thousands; it is running in production on a catalog of roughly 40,000 SKUs. The common thread is not the industry — it is that "does this fit my thing" is the question deciding the sale.
ViewForge's answer:
ViewForge came out of agency work. Normal View was building for a parts retailer running roughly 12,000 SKUs who needed fitment search, and every app we evaluated stored the merchant's compatibility data in the vendor's own database.
That is a strange trade when you look at it directly. Fitment data is genuinely expensive to produce — it is weeks of work — and the merchant would not own the result. It would belong to whichever app happened to be installed that year.
Shopify metaobjects made a different answer possible: write fitment as native structured data inside the merchant's own store. The theme reads it, the Storefront API queries it, Admin GraphQL exports it, and it is still there after an uninstall. That decision is what the rest of the app is built around.
Everything else came from real catalogs rather than a roadmap. Eight verticals exist because a tractor catalog is not Year/Make/Model. Smart Parse exists because that retailer had already written fitment into 12,000 product titles, and nobody was ever going to retype them.
ViewForge's answer:
Share your experience with using Intro.js and ViewForge. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


The free version offers tooltips and screen portion highlights, which might suffice if your app is relatively straightforward. However, Intro.js is designed to be cut and pasted into your app’s code to create...
The onboarding elements are very limited, so any user onboarding designed with Intro.js will not be likely to satisfy every need of a user.
We have no reviews of ViewForge yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Intro.js is an open source JavaScript library that provides an easy way to create simple and effective product tours. It has an approximate file size of 12.5 KB, so it’s a lightweight library that makes building simple walkthroughs easy:... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Intro.js like the others offers a rich set of features such as customizable steps and tooltips, keyboard navigation, theming, progress indicators and more. Like others, this library also has extensive documentation. Intro.js has open... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Intro.js might be what you’re looking for. Source: about 3 years ago
Tracking ViewForge since Aug 2026.
When comparing Intro.js and ViewForge, you can also consider the following products.

Improve user onboarding, feature activation & more — no code required! Stop waiting on dev and start increasing customer engagement today. Try it for free.
Compare Appcues to Intro.js or ViewForge:

Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement.
Compare UserGuiding to Intro.js or ViewForge:

Guide your users through a tour of your app.
Compare ShepherdJS to Intro.js or ViewForge:

Intuitive and customisable tours for user onboarding. A free and complete alternative to IntroJS, Sheperd and the rest.
Compare TourGuideJS to Intro.js or ViewForge:

Product user experience software for product & UX teams
Compare Userpilot to Intro.js or ViewForge:

Fight user churn with great user onboarding. Interactive product tours and smart tips significantly improve your user retention.
Compare Usetiful to Intro.js or ViewForge: