
Appcues
UserGuiding
ShepherdJS
TourGuideJS
Userpilot
Usetiful
Intercom
Simple Javascript framework for adding screen tips

ngrok
LocalXpose
sish
Pagekite
Pinggy.io
zrok
Portmap.io
Instantly share your localhost environment!

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, localhost.run should be more popular than Intro.js. It has been mentioned 42 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | introjs.com | localhost.run |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from Hungary | — |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Intro.js yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Intro.js: Onboard New Users with a Quick Wizard
More videos
No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Intro.js and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


The free version offers tooltips and screen portion highlights, which might suffice if your app is relatively straightforward. However, Intro.js is designed to be cut and pasted into your app’s code to create...
The onboarding elements are very limited, so any user onboarding designed with Intro.js will not be likely to satisfy every need of a user.
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Intro.js is an open source JavaScript library that provides an easy way to create simple and effective product tours. It has an approximate file size of 12.5 KB, so it’s a lightweight library that makes building simple walkthroughs easy:... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Intro.js like the others offers a rich set of features such as customizable steps and tooltips, keyboard navigation, theming, progress indicators and more. Like others, this library also has extensive documentation. Intro.js has open... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Intro.js might be what you’re looking for. Source: about 3 years ago
- This asciinema: https://asciinema.org/a/674501?t=111 Any unix machine (currently only fedora and debian based distro dependencies are auto installed. Passwordless sudo recommended) with tmux if you run this ssh command you’ll get a... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Localhost.run - Simple hosted SSH option. Supports custom domains for a cost. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Localhost.run — Expose locally running servers over a tunnel to a public URL. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
When comparing Intro.js and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products.

Improve user onboarding, feature activation & more — no code required! Stop waiting on dev and start increasing customer engagement today. Try it for free.
Compare Appcues to Intro.js or localhost.run:

ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.
Compare ngrok to Intro.js or localhost.run:

Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement.
Compare UserGuiding to Intro.js or localhost.run:

Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.
Compare LocalXpose to Intro.js or localhost.run:

Guide your users through a tour of your app.
Compare ShepherdJS to Intro.js or localhost.run:

An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.
Compare sish to Intro.js or localhost.run: