ImageCrush VS BatchCrop

ImageCrush's answer

ImageCrush runs the whole image prep job in one pass: crop, resize, convert, compress, rename, and watermark, all in a single batch export. Most Mac tools handle only one of those steps, so you end up chaining two or three apps together. Everything runs locally in a native SwiftUI app. Nothing is uploaded and there's no account. Export settings save as presets, and presets can be chained into sequences, so one export can produce several formats or sizes from the same batch (for example AVIF plus a WebP fallback).

ImageCrush's answer

vs. ImageOptim: ImageOptim compresses well but can't resize, crop, or convert formats. ImageCrush does all of that in the same pass and exports to WebP, HEIC, and AVIF.

vs. TinyPNG and Squoosh: those are web tools, so your images get uploaded and you hit file limits or work one image at a time. ImageCrush processes whole folders offline with no limits.

vs. Compresto and other subscription apps: ImageCrush is a one-time purchase with no subscription. It's focused on images, with no video or PDF features you don't need.

vs. command-line tools: you get the same kind of control with drag-and-drop, a before/after comparison slider, and saved presets, and you don't have to write any scripts.

The 7-day free trial includes every feature, so you can test it on your own images first.

ImageCrush's answer

Mac users who regularly prepare batches of images for the web or for delivery or just need to quickly convert one or two image in a hurry. That means web developers optimizing site assets, designers exporting deliverables at set sizes and formats, content creators and bloggers compressing photos before they upload them to a CMS or social media, and photographers resizing, renaming, and watermarking images for galleries and client proofs. Most of them repeat the same export settings across projects and want that to be one click instead of a multi-app routine.

ImageCrush's answer

I kept repeating the same routine: drag images into ImageOptim to compress them, open Preview or Automator to resize them, then sometimes run a command-line tool to convert the format. That was three tools for what should be one step, and I had to redo it on every project. So I built ImageCrush to do the whole pipeline in one batch, natively on the Mac, with presets so I'd never have to set up the same export twice. Watermarking came later, after a family member who's a school photographer needed a faster way to mark proof galleries. ImageCrush is made by Rocket 5 Studios, a small independent studio.

ImageCrush's answer

Swift and SwiftUI for a fully native macOS app (no Electron and no bundled command-line tools). Image processing uses Apple's ImageIO and Core Graphics frameworks, and WebP encoding uses Google's libwebp. Batches run in parallel with Swift concurrency on up to 8 threads. The app runs inside Apple's App Sandbox, is distributed through the Mac App Store, and runs natively on Apple Silicon and Intel (macOS 15.7 or later).