
GitKraken
SourceTree
GitHub Desktop
SmartGit
Tower
Fork
TortoiseGit
Git Extensions
SourceHut
GitLab
Gitea
GitHub
Gogs
RhodeCode
GitBucket
Deveo
GitKraken
SourceHutBased on our record, SourceHut seems to be a lot more popular than GitKraken. While we know about 68 links to SourceHut, we've tracked only 4 mentions of GitKraken. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I'll have to try this out. I'm currently a huge GitKraken[1] fan. [1] https://gitkraken.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
The Git CLI is terrifying and awful. It's far too easy to clobber your own work -- and that of others -- when the whole point of it was to prevent that. While you still need to really deeply understand several git concepts to use it, GitKraken[0] is the best GUI tool I've used in daily practice. It integrates well with git hosts and has an attractive and mostly comprehensible interface. Accordingly, it isn't free... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I like GitKraken partially because it was originally loosely based on the look/feel of Guitar Hero. Source: about 4 years ago
This experience was also invaluable because I had a walking fountain of knowledge sitting next to me and was really cool about answering my questions and pointing out all code style errors in countless PR reviews. I cannot count the amount of times he had to explain me the whole rebase workflow. What really helped me improve my Git knowledge was GitKraken and other similar tools. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
I'm trying sourcehut at the moment https://sourcehut.org/ and it seems really good - very simple and fast. And does seem to be free for hosting open source projects. Anyone else used it and have thoughts on it? - Source: Hacker News / about 11 hours ago
The offering in question is "A better GitHub" so you are correct. That is an actual quote from the FAQ [0] by the way. In comparison CodeBerg [1] and SourceHut [2] both offer Git hosting but don't merely describe themselves as "GitHub but X". [0] https://gitdot.io/faq [2] https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Would be interested in a comparison with https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Right, I always forget that the sr.ht link is to the application itself. For anybody else who needs it, the page with info about the service is here: https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
I'm probably going to use source hut in the future. It allows contributions via email without an account requirement. https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
SourceTree - Mac and Windows client for Mercurial and Git.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.
Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service
SmartGit - SmartGit is a front-end for the distributed version control system Git and runs on Windows, Mac OS...
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.