GitHub VS Gitpay
Compare GitHub VS Gitpay and see what are their differences
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives.
featured
GitHub
GitLab
BitBucket
VS Code
Git
Treehouse
Pantheon
CodePen
Gitpay
Liberapay
Open Collective
Patreon
Ko-fi
Bandcamp
Buy Me A Coffee
BountySource
GitHubBased on our record, GitHub seems to be a lot more popular than Gitpay. While we know about 2473 links to GitHub, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Gitpay. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Is published at https://github.com/.keys so an SSH server to which you connect could do a reverse lookup. This is the reason why my ~/.ssh/config has those 2 lines at the end:- Source: Hacker News / 6 days agoHost *.
All of this assumes you can actually inspect what the agent did โ the real inputs after resolution, the real tool outputs, the real intermediate steps. That is the other half of the workflow. AgentLens captures the trace: every model and tool step, resolved inputs, raw outputs. agent-eval scores and gates the output; AgentLens gives you the unforgeable, agent-didn't-author trace data for Tier 1+2 to score against... - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
# git: the API token, plus the credential used for the push Kubectl create secret generic foreman-github \ --from-literal=GITHUB_TOKEN="$GITHUB_TOKEN" -n foreman-system Kubectl create secret generic foreman-git-credentials \ --from-literal=token="$GITHUB_TOKEN" -n foreman-system Helm upgrade foreman llmkube/foreman -n foreman-system --reuse-values \ --set agent.githubToken.secretName=foreman-github \ ... - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
This is why eval and observability ship as a unit, not as separate purchases. agent-eval scores and gates the output โ the tiers above, drift, hallucination. AgentLens captures the trace of how the agent got there: every model step and tool call, the resolved inputs, the raw outputs, the trajectory. Two things fall out of that:. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
The real fragility is in trying to constrain arguments. The docs are explicit that a pattern like Bash(curl http://github.com/ *) fails to do what it looks like it does. It won't match curl -X GET http://github.com/... (option before the URL), curl https://github.com/... (different protocol), curl -L http://bit.ly/xyz (redirects to GitHub), URL=http://github.com && curl $URL (variable), or curl http://github.com... - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
I'm thinking of using some bug bounty type of services to speed up bugfixes and adding new features, anyone has experience with it? I mean services like https://www.bountysource.com/ , https://gitpay.me/ or https://issuehunt.io/. Source: about 5 years ago
I don't think we have a good model for monetary rewards for maintenance. If Haskell.org was providing support contracts covering a wide range of libraries, I would guess a lot of companies would use the option. However, signing a support contract with a maintainer of every dependency I have is infeasible. Things like Gitpay (bounties for PRs) have been tried time and again, and they never take off. Source: over 5 years ago
Donate to the project, start a company employing devs, buy support from Canonical or RedHat or SuSE, pay for issues to be fixed through GitPay or BountySource. Source: over 5 years ago
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Liberapay - Liberapay is a recurrent donations platform.
BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Open Collective - Recurring funding for groups.
VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft
Patreon - Patreon enables fans to give ongoing support to their favorite creators.