FriendlyData VS TMSU

• Ease of Use
  FriendlyData allows users to interact with databases using natural language queries, which makes it accessible for non-technical users who are not familiar with complex database query languages.
• Time-Saving
  By enabling natural language processing, FriendlyData reduces the time it takes for users to get the information they need, facilitating quicker decision-making processes.
• Integration
  FriendlyData can be integrated with various platforms and services, making it versatile for different business needs.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Queries Limitation
  While FriendlyData is useful for simple queries, it may struggle to accurately interpret and execute more complex queries, limiting its effectiveness for advanced data analysis.
• Language Ambiguity
  Natural language processing might not always accurately interpret user queries, especially if the input is ambiguous or lacks specificity.
• Dependency on Vendor
  Relying on third-party services like FriendlyData introduces dependency on the vendor for maintenance, updates, and support, which could pose risks if the service changes or is discontinued.

• Flexible Tagging System
  TMSU provides a flexible tagging system that allows users to apply tags to files in a way that is independent of the file system hierarchy, offering more freedom and versatility in organizing files.
• Command-line Interface
  The tool features a powerful command-line interface, making it suitable for users who prefer or require scriptable and efficient terminal-based interactions.
• Minimal Dependencies
  TMSU has minimal dependencies beyond basic software development tools and support for SQLite, making it lightweight and easy to install.
• Non-intrusive
  It operates without modifying the files directly, maintaining the integrity of existing file structures and contents.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  For users unfamiliar with command-line operations or tagging systems, there may be a learning curve to effectively use the tool.
• Performance
  With very large datasets, the performance of tag queries can become slower, depending on the number of files and tags used.
• Backup and Sync Complexity
  Since tag data is stored separately from the file system, backing up or syncing the tag database alongside files requires additional steps.
• Lack of GUI
  Some users may find the lack of a graphical user interface limiting, especially if they prefer visual-based file management.

Tracking FriendlyData since Mar 2021.

• If it is worth keeping, save it in Markdown

  Just a note that the most common Markdown flavor (Commonmark) doesn't actually support frontmatter. The author is using presumably Obisidian-flavored Markdown (which is a mixture of Commonmark, GH-flavored Markdown, and Latex). For... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Tips on how to structure your home directory (2023)

  You may want to try TagSpaces https://www.tagspaces.org/ or TMSU https://tmsu.org/ which provide mechanisms for managing tags of arbitrary files (not only EXIF or ID3 ones). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Johnny Decimal: A System to Organize Projects

  The author of TMSU left a sibling comment to yours: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37507343 > TMSU is a tool for tagging your files. It provides a simple command-line tool for applying tags and a virtual filesystem so that you can... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

View more