Software Alternatives & Startups

Fluid VS Standard Notes

Compare Fluid VS Standard Notes and see what are their differences

Fluid

Turn Your Favorite Web Apps into Real Mac Apps.

Rating
0 reviews
Standard Notes

A safe place for your notes, thoughts, and life's work

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Standard Notes should be more popular than Fluid. It has been mentioned 131 times since March 2021.

social mentions
19 vs 131
Mac popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
88 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Fluid
Standard Notes
Website fluidapp.com standardnotes.com
Pricing —
Open source Official pricing
Company — Startup from the United States
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Fluid 5 features
Standard Notes 4 features
  • Dedicated Browsers
    Fluid creates site-specific browsers that allow users to have dedicated apps for their favorite web pages. This can enhance focus and organization by keeping tasks separate from regular web browsing.
  • Custom User Experience
    Each Site Specific Browser (SSB) can have a custom icon and name, providing a more personalized and aesthetically pleasing user interface.
  • Resource Management
    Having dedicated apps for regularly used web services can minimize the use of browser tabs and extensions, potentially leading to better performance and resource management.
  • Independence from Web Browser
    Fluid apps are independent of the main web browser. This means that if your browser crashes or has issues, your Fluid apps remain unaffected.
  • Enhanced Productivity
    By converting web apps into standalone desktop applications, users can more easily compartmentalize their work, leading to enhanced productivity.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to MacOS
    Fluid is available only for MacOS, which limits its usability to Mac users and excludes users on other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
  • Manual Updates
    Users need to manually update each Site Specific Browser (SSB) created through Fluid, as these do not automatically update like regular browser tabs.
  • Security Risks
    As Fluid apps are essentially wrappers for web pages, they are subject to the same security risks as any web browser. Users need to ensure they are visiting trusted sites.
  • Limited Functionality
    Unlike full-fledged desktop applications, Fluid apps might have limited native functionality. They rely heavily on the web app's own features and may lack advanced desktop integrations.
  • Cost for Full Features
    While Fluid is free to use, certain advanced features, such as pinning apps to the status bar, require a one-time purchase of Fluid's paid version.
  • End-to-End Encryption
    Standard Notes ensures that all your data is encrypted before it leaves your device. This means only you have access to your notes, offering a high level of security and privacy.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Standard Notes is available on multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android. This ensures that you can access your notes from virtually any device.
  • Open Source
    The source code for Standard Notes is publicly available, which means it can be audited by anyone for security and reliability. This transparency builds trust within the community.
  • Extended Features via Subscription
    While the basic version is free, subscribing to Standard Notes unlocks extended features such as editors, encrypted file storage, and automatic backups.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of Standard Notes is quite basic, offering only plain text notes. Advanced features like rich text editors, themes, and file attachments require a subscription.
  • Subscription Costs
    To access the extended features, users need to commit to a subscription plan, which may not be affordable or worthwhile for everyone.
  • Advanced Configuration Required
    While the app is designed to be simple, making full use of its advanced features can require a bit of a learning curve, especially for users who aren't tech-savvy.
  • Limited Built-In Collaboration Features
    Unlike some other note-taking apps, Standard Notes does not support real-time collaboration or sharing, which can be a downside for users looking to collaborate easily with others.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Fluid
Standard Notes

Overall verdict

  • Fluid is a good option for macOS users who find themselves frequently switching between web applications and want a more streamlined process. It's especially useful for those who prefer to keep web app sessions isolated or those who enjoy customizing their workflows. However, consider that it is only available for macOS and may not support all features of more complex web applications.

Why this product is good

  • Fluid (fluidapp.com) allows users to create site-specific browsers, which can be useful for treating web applications as standalone apps on macOS. This can help with productivity by preventing web distractions and organizing workflows. Fluid is particularly beneficial if you frequently use web apps and want them to function like native applications with their own dock icons and separate sessions.

Recommended for

  • MacOS users looking to create desktop-like experiences for web applications.
  • Individuals seeking to minimize distractions from other open tabs in a standard browser.
  • Users who need isolated sessions for different web applications.
  • People who appreciate customizing their desktop workflow.

No analysis of Standard Notes yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Fluid 3 videos + Add
Standard Notes 2 videos + Add

Primochill Vue Fluid Review

More videos

  • - FluidReview - Accept Online Applications and Submissions and Review
  • - Golden Matte Fluid Acrylic Review • An Alternative to Gouache?

Standard Notes: Full Review, Pricing & Thoughts

More videos

  • - Standard Notes: Premium Review

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Fluid
Standard Notes
100% 100%
Mac
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Fluid and Standard Notes. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Fluid no reviews yet
Standard Notes no reviews yet

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Fluid 19 mentions
Standard Notes 131 mentions
  • ToDesktop – Web app to desktop app in minutes
    > Is ToDesktop For Me? > If you want to make a desktop app of a website for your personal use, ToDesktop is overkill. I just want to point out that a lot of us "pros" learn how to use tools like this by semi-personal use. Therefore, you... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • in safari Sonoma, do profiles act like containers ? (firefox container)
    If you haven't used Fluid - https://fluidapp.com , I would recommend trying the free download. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Why is it so hard to change Chromium's UI?
    You can use Min, Fluid or any browser with full screen mode to have the same effect. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

View more

Alternatives to Fluid and Standard Notes

When comparing Fluid and Standard Notes, you can also consider the following products.