Table of contents
Dedicated Browsers
Fluid creates site-specific browsers that allow users to have dedicated apps for their favorite web pages. This can enhance focus and organization by keeping tasks separate from regular web browsing.
Custom User Experience
Each Site Specific Browser (SSB) can have a custom icon and name, providing a more personalized and aesthetically pleasing user interface.
Resource Management
Having dedicated apps for regularly used web services can minimize the use of browser tabs and extensions, potentially leading to better performance and resource management.
Independence from Web Browser
Fluid apps are independent of the main web browser. This means that if your browser crashes or has issues, your Fluid apps remain unaffected.
Enhanced Productivity
By converting web apps into standalone desktop applications, users can more easily compartmentalize their work, leading to enhanced productivity.
Fluid is a good option for macOS users who find themselves frequently switching between web applications and want a more streamlined process. It's especially useful for those who prefer to keep web app sessions isolated or those who enjoy customizing their workflows. However, consider that it is only available for macOS and may not support all features of more complex web applications.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Fluid is good.
Check the traffic stats of Fluid on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Fluid on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Fluid's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Fluid on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Fluid on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
> Is ToDesktop For Me? > If you want to make a desktop app of a website for your personal use, ToDesktop is overkill. I just want to point out that a lot of us "pros" learn how to use tools like this by semi-personal use. Therefore, you might want to consider a free personal version that's crippled in a mildly annoying way: For example, no installer, don't sign the app, and have an easily-ignorable nag. (Therefore... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
If you haven't used Fluid - https://fluidapp.com , I would recommend trying the free download. Source: over 2 years ago
You can use Min, Fluid or any browser with full screen mode to have the same effect. Source: over 2 years ago
Https://fluidapp.com/ might do it for you. Other applications like this also exist. Source: over 2 years ago
Does Fluid[1] work as a solution for you? I’m on an older OS with an older version but I love it for creating single-site apps. [1] https://fluidapp.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Rectangle Pro can do that, if you pair it with advanced bettertouchtool triggers. But I don't think your solution is optimal, it'd be much easier to create a reddit.com webapp with e.g. fluid.app, make so every reddit link is handled via the reddit webapp using e.g. openin.app, and just store its size and location in app window presets which Rectangle or BTT can do easily. Source: over 2 years ago
Didn't know that about Edge, thanks! For other browsers (incl Edge) Fluid does the same for me (http://fluidapp.com (not affiliated)) After opening a few emails:. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
I use Fluid app for some stuff like this. There's a free version that may suffice. Source: almost 3 years ago
I appreciate your post. I think for your requirements, there could/should be some kind of packaging app for websites like used to exist for "widgets". These seem to exist for macOS, which seems to be precisely the platform that you don't use -- see https://fluidapp.com for example. Source: about 3 years ago
You could use fluid or Coherence X and use Alfred - Productivity App for macOS or spotlight to launch them. Source: about 3 years ago
Or Fluid which is free except for a few features which cost $5 (https://fluidapp.com/). - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
You can use the free Fluid app (https://fluidapp.com) to turn any single website into its own Mac Desktop application. You should give that a shot if you really want each site to have their own app. Source: almost 4 years ago
I don’t have a direct answer, but you could check if Fluid does the job. Source: almost 4 years ago
Unfortunately I don’t like Electron, and I did try out some solutions (e.g. Fluid[0]) that don’t use Electron, but it felt best to create a native Mac app with Cocoa. [0]: https://fluidapp.com. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
I prefer Fluid on the Mac, does the same thing and uses the Safari engine. Source: about 4 years ago
On Mac, Fluid makes any web app into a standalone "native" app. It's how I use Fastmail and it works well. Source: over 4 years ago
It wasn’t Unite 4, but I appreciate knowing about it now. It’s an older app called Fluid. At the time it was one or two of its kind, but the dev hasn’t caught up with newer macOS and there are so many competitors know; I imagine they’ve given up. Although if that’s the case, it’s a shame the app is still for sale. Source: over 4 years ago
You can try using Fluid, as it can convert a website into a desktop app. The only major con is that you can't use the app in Full Screen mode. Source: over 4 years ago
I made Orion as a very simple app to learn flutter. I was inspired by Fluid on the mac and I wanted to make a mobile version. Any reviews and advice would be greatly appreciated. Source: over 4 years ago
Fluid, a Mac-focused application, is a simple yet effective tool utilized to transform web apps into standalone desktop applications. It caters primarily to users within the Group Chat & Notifications, Messaging, Mac, and Development Tools categories. Upon analyzing recent mentions and discussions, various opinions and insights emerge surrounding the app.
Fluid is frequently recognized for its ability to convert websites into standalone applications, allowing for easier management and organization of web apps on macOS. It is praised for its simplicity in execution without the overhead associated with more complex frameworks like Electron. This capability makes it a notable choice for single-site applications, particularly for users who find managing multiple browser tabs cumbersome.
Enthusiasts appreciate Fluid's effectiveness in creating "native" applications for sites such as email clients or social media platforms, enhancing productivity by offering a distraction-free environment. The app is particularly favored by individuals who enjoy turning various websites into separate Mac apps, thus organizing their digital workspace more efficiently. However, its adoption appears limited to macOS users, with some expressing disappointment that equivalent solutions are not as evident on other platforms.
In comparison to some of its competitors, such as WebCatalog, Coherence X, and Unite for macOS, Fluid holds its own in user satisfaction primarily due to its straightforward user experience and the low entry barrier of a free version with accessible paid features. Its approachability makes Fluid a practical starting point for both professionals and casual users exploring the realm of standalone web applications. The free version of Fluid is seen as adequately armed for personal use, while the additional features, available for a modest fee, provide increased functionality without excessive financial commitments.
On the criticism front, the app occasionally receives feedback regarding its limitations in feature updates and evolving compatibility with the latest macOS versions. Some users note that developers have not kept pace with competitive offerings, potentially making its longevity in the rapidly evolving app ecosystem uncertain. Nonetheless, it remains a viable option for users seeking simplicity and functionality without diving into elaborate technical setups.
Furthermore, Fluid has inspired other developers, as seen with the creation of Orion, indicating its impact on the app development community by encouraging innovation and adaptation of its core premise across platforms.
Overall, Fluid continues to be seen as a valuable tool for transforming web applications into more manageable, standalone desktop entities on macOS, appreciated for its efficiency, ease of use, and role in streamlining digital workflows, albeit with a growing need to address compatibility and feature updates to maintain its competitive edge.
Do you know an article comparing Fluid to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Fluid good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Fluid here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
