Fathom Analytics Reviews

Flightcontrol.dev Reviews

Fathom Analytics mentions (66)

• Migrating Off Google Analytics: Umami vs Plausible vs Fathom

  So this post is about something I've been chewing on for months but finally moved on: ripping Google Analytics out of three side projects and picking a privacy-focused alternative. Specifically, I'll compare Umami, Plausible, and Fathom — the three I actually evaluated — and walk through the migration steps that worked for me. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Google Analytics Alternatives: Umami vs Plausible vs Fathom in 2026

  Fathom is the most "premium" option. No self-hosted version — it's a paid product, and they lean into that. The upside is it just works, with excellent uptime and performance. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Migrating from Google Analytics to Privacy-Focused Alternatives

  Fathom takes a different approach — it's a proprietary, hosted-only product. No self-hosting option. They've bet everything on being the simplest, most privacy-respecting paid analytics tool. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Qwen 3 vs Llama 3: Configuring Local LLMs for Actual Performance

  I've been using Umami for this — it's a self-hosted, privacy-focused analytics tool that doesn't require cookie banners and is fully GDPR-compliant out of the box. Compared to alternatives like Plausible (also excellent, but their hosted plan costs more) or Fathom (hosted-only, pricier), Umami hits a sweet spot of simplicity and zero cost if you self-host. You get clean dashboards showing endpoint usage, response... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Blocking AI Crawlers vs. Letting Them In: A Practical Defense Guide

  Fathom is the premium option. It's not open source and not self-hostable, but it's rock solid and has excellent uptime. Starts at $15/month. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

Flightcontrol.dev mentions (5)

• Reclaim the Stack

  Since DHH has been promoting the 'do-it-yourself' approach, many people have fallen for it. You're asking the right questions that only a few people know they need answers to. In my opinion, the closest thing to "reclaiming the stack" while still being a PaaS is to use a "deploy to your cloud account" PaaS provider. These services offer the convenience of a PaaS provider, yet allow you to "eject" to using the... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  Flightcontrol.dev - Deploy web services, databases, and more on your own AWS account with a Git push style workflow. Free tier for users with 1 developer on personal GitHub repos. AWS costs are billed through AWS, but you can use credits and the AWS free tier. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• MVP has too many mandatory features + Technical Hurdles?

  Have you seen https://www.flightcontrol.dev/? It might help you out with that infrastructure issue with the ease of PaaS! Source: over 3 years ago

• How do you deploy your NextJS site in production?

  Flightcontrol.dev is also pretty interesting if for some reason you want to deploy directly on AWS. Source: almost 4 years ago

• Are there any SaaS out there built on top of AWS? Like a more UI friendly interface for aws console? Thinking about SES that’s really complicated to configure. A SaaS that can abstract that complexity

  Flightcontrol.dev is what you're looking for. Source: over 4 years ago