Evil Icons VS git-sizer

• Open Source
  Evil Icons is open source, meaning that anyone can use, modify, and contribute to its development. This makes it particularly appealing for developers looking for a transparent and community-driven project.
• Simple and Minimalist Design
  The icons are designed to be simple and minimalist, which makes them versatile for use in a wide range of projects without overwhelming the design aesthetics.
• Ease of Use
  Evil Icons offers a straightforward integration process, allowing developers to easily include the icons within their projects whether they're using SVGs or web fonts.
• Scalable
  As vector icons, Evil Icons are inherently scalable, allowing designers to resize them without any loss of quality, which is ideal for responsive design.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Icon Set
  The library offers a relatively limited set of icons compared to more comprehensive icon libraries, which might not have all the icons needed for complex projects.
• Basic Functionality
  While simplicity is a strength, it also means Evil Icons lacks the advanced and specialized icons or customization options that larger libraries might offer.
• Less Frequent Updates
  Being a smaller project, Evil Icons may not receive updates and new icons as frequently as larger, more actively maintained icon libraries.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

No analysis of Evil Icons yet.

Tracking Evil Icons since Mar 2021.

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago