Software Alternatives & Startups

EveryStep VS Ghost Inspector

Compare EveryStep VS Ghost Inspector and see what are their differences

EveryStep

EveryStep is a free automation tool that records "every step" of a web transaction and...

EveryStep Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Ghost Inspector

Easily create automated browser tests for your websites and web apps. Ensure everything works and looks the way it should. No coding required. 14 day free trial!

Ghost Inspector Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly (10,000 test runs per month; 5 member seats)

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Ghost Inspector seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 8 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 8
Browser Testing popularity
16% vs 84%
alternatives listed
52 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

EveryStep
Ghost Inspector
Website everystep-automation.com ghostinspector.com
Pricing
Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly (10,000 test runs per month; 5 member seats) Official pricing
Platforms
Browser Google Chrome Firefox REST API Wordpress JavaScript Web Slack Docker AWS +7
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

EveryStep 0 features
Ghost Inspector 7 features

No features have been listed yet.

  • Ease of Use
    Ghost Inspector provides a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of creating and managing automated tests. Non-technical users can also easily create tests using the browser extension.
  • No Coding Required
    Tests can be created without writing any code, making it accessible to a broader range of users, including those without a technical background.
  • Browser Extension
    The browser extension allows users to record actions directly in their browser, which is convenient for quickly setting up tests.
  • Integration
    Ghost Inspector integrates with various CI/CD tools and platforms, such as Jenkins, CircleCI, and Slack, allowing for seamless integration into existing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    The platform supports visual testing to catch layout issues by comparing screenshots of expected and actual states of web pages.
  • Scheduling
    Tests can be scheduled to run at specific intervals, which helps in continuous monitoring of web applications.
  • Team Collaboration
    Collaborative features such as team management and shared test suites make it easier for multiple team members to work together.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Ghost Inspector is a paid service, and while there is a free tier, the premium plans can become costly, particularly for small teams or startups.
  • Limited Advanced Customization
    For highly complex testing scenarios, the lack of coding may be restrictive. Users might find it challenging to implement advanced custom logic compared to code-based testing frameworks.
  • Performance Testing
    The platform is not designed for performance testing, so it is not a suitable solution if you need detailed performance metrics.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Tests
    Although the interface is user-friendly, creating complex tests can still require a learning curve, particularly for users with no prior experience in automated testing.
  • Environment Dependency
    Tests created using the browser extension can sometimes behave differently on different environments, requiring additional tuning and maintenance.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

EveryStep
Ghost Inspector

Overall verdict

  • EveryStep is a solid, user-friendly tool for creating automated web and mobile scripts without extensive coding knowledge, making it a valuable option for functional testing and website monitoring.

Why this product is good

  • Allows recording of user interactions to create automated scripts easily
  • Supports both web and mobile application testing scenarios
  • Integrates well with monitoring solutions to verify site functionality and uptime
  • Reduces the need for deep programming expertise, lowering the barrier to entry
  • Helps catch multi-step transaction issues before they affect end users

Recommended for

  • Businesses that want to monitor critical multi-step web transactions like logins or checkouts
  • QA teams looking for accessible functional testing automation
  • Website owners who need proactive uptime and performance monitoring
  • Non-developers who want to build automated test scripts without heavy coding
  • Companies aiming to ensure consistent user experience across web and mobile platforms

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Ghost Inspector is a good tool for many automation testing needs.

Why this product is good

  • It offers a user-friendly interface that allows for easy creation and management of automated browser tests.
  • The tool supports integration with a variety of CI/CD platforms, making it suitable for DevOps environments.
  • Ghost Inspector provides robust reporting and notifications to keep teams informed about test outcomes.
  • It is cloud-based, which means there's no need for local infrastructure setup or maintenance.
  • The tool supports visual testing by capturing screenshots at each step of the test, helping to identify UI regressions.

Recommended for

  • QA engineers and testers looking for a straightforward, codeless solution to automate browser testing.
  • Development teams seeking to integrate end-to-end testing into their CI/CD pipeline easily.
  • Organizations that require reliable, scalable browser testing solutions without the overhead of maintaining testing infrastructure.
  • Product teams looking for non-technical team members to participate in creating and maintaining automated tests.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

EveryStep 0 videos + Add
Ghost Inspector 3 videos + Add

No EveryStep videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Ghost Inspector - Automated UI Testing and Monitoring

More videos

  • Review - Data-driven Testing with Selenium using Ghost Inspector
  • Review - Automated Testing with Ghost Inspector

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
EveryStep
Ghost Inspector
16% 16%
84% 84%
6% 6%
94% 94%
7% 7%
93% 93%
14% 14%
86% 86%

User comments

Share your experience with using EveryStep and Ghost Inspector. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

EveryStep no reviews yet
Ghost Inspector no reviews yet

We have no reviews of EveryStep yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

EveryStep 0 mentions
Ghost Inspector 8 mentions

Tracking EveryStep since Mar 2021.

  • 25 Best SaaS Testing Tools [2024]
    Ghost Inspector is an excellent choice for teams looking to automate browser testing without writing code. As one of the best SaaS testing tools, it enables users to effortlessly create automated tests, allowing them to quickly identify... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Cheap tests with Ghost Inspector
    Ghost Inspector is a testing service for monitoring key site functionality. All tests are stored in the cloud and running continuously and notify you on error or variance is detected. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • How do you full functional/regression tests in Svelte/Sveltekit?
    Playwright is good but there is also other kind of tools like https://reflect.run/ and https://ghostinspector.com/ that are perfect for end user testing. Hope it helps. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to EveryStep and Ghost Inspector

When comparing EveryStep and Ghost Inspector, you can also consider the following products.