Evernote Reviews

1. Olivia_Sass

   over 1 year ago
   Simple and efficient app

   The app helps keep everything organized and is really easy to use. I’ve been using it for a while now, and I really like it.

2. Boyd Richardson

   · Writer at SE · over 3 years ago

   If you're someone who likes to keep everything in order and easily accessible, you'll want to check out the Evernote app. This app is designed to help you keep track of all your notes, ideas, and to-do lists in one place, and it does so with style.

   From my experience using the app, I found that it's incredibly user-friendly and has a sleek design. You can easily create notes, organize them into notebooks, and even add tags to make it easier to find what you're looking for later on. Whether you're a student trying to keep track of your class notes or a busy professional juggling multiple projects, Evernote has you covered.

   🏁 Competitors: Notion

   👍 Pros:    High capabilities|Supports multiple languages|Syncs|Easy integration

   👎 Cons:    Free plan with limited options|Syncing issue
3. Deepak Kumar

   · Technical Reviewer at Screenshot Chrome Extensions · over 5 years ago
   Intuitive Software

   The thing that I personally like about Evernote is that before I have used word as my note taking application, than on my smartphone I have had used Google Keep and so my notes were just unorganized mess. But with Evernote now I can have my notes at one place and unified. Also the fact that I can log to another device and my notes are "just there" is really nice. And also I like graphics user interface of Evernote.

   🏁 Competitors: OneNote, Google Keep, Jama Connect, Zoho Notebook, Simplenote

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Saves a ton of time|Sync across all my devices|Chrome extension available

   👎 Cons:    Few webpages takes time to load|Paid plan to use on multiple devices

Webpack Reviews

Evernote mentions (66)

• Two years with Obsidian: How notes changed the way I store information

  Obsidian is a multi-platform note-taking and writing app. Simple enough. But aren't there plenty of those around? Yes absolutely, but they each have downsides that I wasn't able to settle with long-term. With Google Cloud it was the difficult of linking between notes (this has improved since but it's still not quite what I want). With Evernote my notes were in a proprietary format and stuck in the cloud. Notion... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Simple Hack to Learn 2X Faster

  Notion, Obsidian, or Evernote: Great for organizing notes with tags, links, and summaries. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• 23 Best Mobile Website Design Examples and Best Practices

  Evernote‘s mobile website design maintains its brand style and color palette, featuring a clean and simple layout. The site’s centered call-to-action, “Sign up for free,” clearly directs users toward conversion while emphasizing the app’s value without distraction. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  Evernote.com — Tool for organizing information. Share your notes and work together with others. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• List of apps I use every day - Version 2023

  Shottr: A tool for taking screenshots and sharing them with others. It offers more functionality than the native macOS tool and is much lighter than Skitch. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

Webpack mentions (253)

• History of JavaScript: Browser wars, ECMAScript, Node.js, TypeScript, and React

  In 2012, Webpack was released as an open-source JavaScript module bundler. It takes dependencies as input and builds a dependency graph, enabling developers to take a modular approach to web application development. This allowed them to import almost anything to client-side code and, over time, became the foundation of the build process for React, Angular, Vue, and many other frameworks. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago

• Next.js vs Remix: What's the Difference?

  From a developer experience perspective, it's worth noting that Next.js was built using webpack for bundling, which has struggled to maintain performance. Therefore, when changing something in the code, reload times can be very slow. For this reason, the Next.js team has been working on getting full compatibility on its own bundler, Turbopack. As of Next.js 14, Turbopack is still considered beta but is much faster... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Claude Code's Source Didn't Leak. It Was Already Public for Years.

  The reality is simple: minification was never security. It's a size optimization that bundlers like esbuild, Webpack, and Rollup do by default. Variable renaming slows down human readers but LLMs read minified code like you read formatted code. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• React Server Components without Next.js - what are the real alternatives today?

  There are also no-framework approaches. These rely directly on React-provided packages and low-level integrations with bundlers like Webpack or experimental support in tools like Bun. While technically possible, these setups are fragile. React explicitly does not guarantee stability of these internal APIs. Any team choosing this route must accept ongoing maintenance risk. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Workspaces, react and vite. A real-world case study for managing duplicate libraries.

  Before addressing the solution, it's useful to contextualize the role of the bundler. In a modern frontend architecture, the bundler (such as webpack, rollup, or vite) has the task of traversing the application's dependency graph, resolving each import statement, to combine modules and assets into static files optimized for browser execution. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago