Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

EMC Documentum VS OnCore

Compare EMC Documentum VS OnCore and see what are their differences

EMC Documentum logo EMC Documentum

Enterprise content management service

OnCore logo OnCore

OnCore Enterprise Research system supports efficient processes at academic medical centers, cancer centers, and health care systems.
  • EMC Documentum Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15
  • OnCore Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26

EMC Documentum features and specs

  • Scalability
    EMC Documentum is designed to handle large volumes of content, making it suitable for organizations with extensive content management needs.
  • Robust Security
    The platform provides advanced security features such as user authentication, role-based access control, and encryption, ensuring data integrity and confidentiality.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Documentum seamlessly integrates with various enterprise applications and supports a wide range of file formats, enhancing its versatility.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    Strong support for industry standards and regulations, such as HIPAA and GDPR, helps organizations maintain compliance with legal requirements.
  • Customizability
    The platform allows for extensive customization to tailor workflows and features to specific business needs, improving operational efficiency.

Possible disadvantages of EMC Documentum

  • Complexity
    The system's advanced features and customization options may lead to a steep learning curve and require specialized knowledge for effective utilization.
  • Cost
    The licensing, implementation, and maintenance costs associated with Documentum can be high, potentially making it less accessible for smaller organizations.
  • Performance
    Some users may experience slow performance with large-scale deployments or complex workflows, which can impact productivity.
  • User Interface
    The user interface can be seen as outdated or not user-friendly by some, potentially affecting user adoption and satisfaction.
  • Upgrade Challenges
    Upgrading the platform can be complex and time-consuming, with potential compatibility issues between different versions.

OnCore features and specs

  • Comprehensive Functionality
    OnCore offers a wide range of features, including protocol management, subject tracking, financial management, and reporting, designed to streamline the clinical trial process.
  • Integration Capability
    The system can integrate with other platforms and electronic health records (EHRs), facilitating seamless data flow across different systems involved in clinical trials.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    OnCore ensures compliance with regulatory requirements, helping institutions maintain adherence to industry standards and avoid potential legal and financial penalties.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can customize the workflows to better match their specific clinical trial processes, making the system flexible to different institutional needs.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    OnCore promotes better collaboration among different stakeholders, including researchers, administrators, and finance departments, by providing a centralized platform for data and communication.

Possible disadvantages of OnCore

  • High Implementation Costs
    The initial setup and ongoing maintenance costs can be high, potentially making it less accessible for smaller research sites or institutions with limited budgets.
  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive nature, the system can be complex and may require extensive training for users to become proficient, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While customization is a feature, it can be challenging and may require additional time and technical expertise to tailor the system to specific institutional needs.
  • Dependency on Technical Support
    Users may frequently need to rely on technical support for troubleshooting and system management, which could add to the operational costs and time delays.
  • Data Migration Issues
    Migrating legacy data into OnCore can be difficult, involving complex procedures to ensure data accuracy and completeness during the transition.

EMC Documentum videos

Compare Drawings in Brava for EMC Documentum

More videos:

  • Review - Viewing Documents in Brava for EMC Documentum
  • Review - Consolidating Markups in Brava for EMC Documentum

OnCore videos

OnCore ELIXR - Guerrilla Golf Ball Testing vs Pro-V1

More videos:

  • Review - Best Golf Ball - OnCore Review - Wendell CC - Golf Test Dummy
  • Review - ONCORE ELIXR: Golf Ball Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to EMC Documentum and OnCore)
Clinical Trial Management System
SMS Surveys
7 7%
93% 93
Text Messaging
0 0%
100% 100
Clinical Trials
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using EMC Documentum and OnCore. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing EMC Documentum and OnCore, you can also consider the following products

Inova Software - Read 17 Inova Software Customer Reviews & Customer References. These use cases, approaches and end results from real customers include 12 testimonials & reviews and 5 case studies, success stories, reviews, user stories & customer stories.

OpenClinica - OpenClinica is an open source clinical trials software.

ClinicalHawk EDC - ClinicalHawk EDC An Electronic Data Capture software streamlines the gathering of trial patient data for early to late-stage clinical research phases, as well as post-approval studies.

Castor EDC - Castor offers you a user-friendly and fully featured application for electronic data collection.

DSG Data Management - DSG offers a comprehensive and fully integrated stack of EDC, IRT, CTMS, and data management services for clinical trial study research and the life sciences industries.

Medidata CTMS - Medidata CTMS seamlessly integrates with Medidata Rave to provide real-time views into study progress without manual tracking.