Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

DSG Data Management VS OnCore

Compare DSG Data Management VS OnCore and see what are their differences

DSG Data Management logo DSG Data Management

DSG offers a comprehensive and fully integrated stack of EDC, IRT, CTMS, and data management services for clinical trial study research and the life sciences industries.

OnCore logo OnCore

OnCore Enterprise Research system supports efficient processes at academic medical centers, cancer centers, and health care systems.
  • DSG Data Management Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-16
  • OnCore Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26

DSG Data Management features and specs

  • Expertise and Experience
    DSG Data Management has a longstanding presence in the industry, offering extensive expertise and experience in data management solutions, which can be beneficial for businesses looking for reliable services.
  • Comprehensive Services
    The company offers a wide range of data management services, including data warehousing, data integration, and data analytics, providing a one-stop solution for comprehensive data needs.
  • Client-Centric Approach
    DSG is known for its client-centric approach, tailoring solutions to meet the specific needs of each client, thus enhancing customer satisfaction and effectiveness of the solutions provided.
  • Strong Technology Partnerships
    The company has established partnerships with major technology providers, which allows it to leverage cutting-edge technology and tools in its service offerings.

Possible disadvantages of DSG Data Management

  • Cost Considerations
    The comprehensive and high-quality services offered by DSG Data Management might come at a premium price, which could be a concern for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.
  • Complexity of Implementation
    For some clients, integrating DSG's solutions may be complex due to the comprehensive and sophisticated nature of the offerings, potentially requiring significant time and resources for proper implementation.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Technologies
    While partnerships with major technology providers are a strength, they may also lead to dependency on third-party technologies, which could impact service delivery if those third-party services face disruptions.

OnCore features and specs

  • Comprehensive Functionality
    OnCore offers a wide range of features, including protocol management, subject tracking, financial management, and reporting, designed to streamline the clinical trial process.
  • Integration Capability
    The system can integrate with other platforms and electronic health records (EHRs), facilitating seamless data flow across different systems involved in clinical trials.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    OnCore ensures compliance with regulatory requirements, helping institutions maintain adherence to industry standards and avoid potential legal and financial penalties.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can customize the workflows to better match their specific clinical trial processes, making the system flexible to different institutional needs.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    OnCore promotes better collaboration among different stakeholders, including researchers, administrators, and finance departments, by providing a centralized platform for data and communication.

Possible disadvantages of OnCore

  • High Implementation Costs
    The initial setup and ongoing maintenance costs can be high, potentially making it less accessible for smaller research sites or institutions with limited budgets.
  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive nature, the system can be complex and may require extensive training for users to become proficient, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While customization is a feature, it can be challenging and may require additional time and technical expertise to tailor the system to specific institutional needs.
  • Dependency on Technical Support
    Users may frequently need to rely on technical support for troubleshooting and system management, which could add to the operational costs and time delays.
  • Data Migration Issues
    Migrating legacy data into OnCore can be difficult, involving complex procedures to ensure data accuracy and completeness during the transition.

DSG Data Management videos

No DSG Data Management videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

OnCore videos

OnCore ELIXR - Guerrilla Golf Ball Testing vs Pro-V1

More videos:

  • Review - Best Golf Ball - OnCore Review - Wendell CC - Golf Test Dummy
  • Review - ONCORE ELIXR: Golf Ball Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to DSG Data Management and OnCore)
Clinical Trial Management System
SMS Surveys
13 13%
87% 87
Text Messaging
0 0%
100% 100
Clinical Trials
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using DSG Data Management and OnCore. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing DSG Data Management and OnCore, you can also consider the following products

Castor EDC - Castor offers you a user-friendly and fully featured application for electronic data collection.

OpenClinica - OpenClinica is an open source clinical trials software.

REDCap - REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) is a secure web application for building and managing...

Medidata CTMS - Medidata CTMS seamlessly integrates with Medidata Rave to provide real-time views into study progress without manual tracking.

Viedoc - EDC, ePRO, eCRF, eTMF, CDMS, electronic data capture, clinical trial and PMS software

secuTrial - Electronic Data Capture โ€“ Simple.