Software Alternatives & Startups

EJS VS Thunkable

Compare EJS VS Thunkable and see what are their differences

EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Thunkable

Powerful but easy to use, drag-and-drop mobile app builder.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, EJS should be more popular than Thunkable. It has been mentioned 26 times since March 2021.

social mentions
26 vs 10
Javascript UI Libraries popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
157 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

EJS
EJS
Thunkable
Website ejs.co thunkable.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

EJS
EJS 6 features
Thunkable 5 features
  • Simplicity
    EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
  • JavaScript Integration
    Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
  • Lightweight
    EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
  • Flexibility
    Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
  • Partial Templates
    Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
  • Debugging
    Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
  • Maintenance
    Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
  • Community and Support
    While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Thunkable offers a drag-and-drop interface which makes it easy for beginners to create mobile apps without needing to write code.
  • Cross-Platform Development
    It allows you to build apps that work on both iOS and Android platforms from a single codebase, saving time and effort.
  • Community and Support
    Thunkable has an active community and extensive documentation, which can be very helpful for troubleshooting and learning new features.
  • Real-time Testing
    You can test your app in real-time using the Thunkable Live app, which speeds up the development process.
  • Integrations
    Thunkable offers various pre-built integrations such as Google Sheets, Firebase, and REST APIs, making it easier to add functionality to your app.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Customization
    While the drag-and-drop interface is user-friendly, it can also be limiting for advanced users who need more control and customization.
  • Performance Issues
    Apps built with Thunkable may not perform as well as those built with native development tools, particularly for resource-intensive applications.
  • Pricing
    While Thunkable offers a free tier, many advanced features and higher usage limits are locked behind a subscription paywall.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Apps
    Although it’s beginner-friendly, creating complex apps can still require a steep learning curve, especially if you don’t have a background in app development.
  • Dependence on Platform Limitations
    As a cross-platform tool, it may not always support the latest features specific to iOS or Android as quickly as native solutions.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

EJS
EJS
Thunkable

Overall verdict

  • Yes, EJS is considered good, particularly for projects where developers want ease of use and flexibility with JavaScript templating. It is lightweight, easy to learn, and integrates well with Express, a popular Node.js web application framework.

Why this product is good

  • EJS (Embedded JavaScript Templating) is popular because it provides a simple way to generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. It allows for the embedding of JavaScript logic within your HTML templates, making it straightforward to use for those familiar with JavaScript. It's known for its efficiency in rendering templates and ease of integration with Node.js applications.

Recommended for

    EJS is recommended for developers building server-side web applications using Node.js and those looking for a simple, yet effective, templating solution. It is particularly suitable for small to medium-sized projects where dynamic content generation is needed and for teams that prioritize simplicity and performance.

Overall verdict

  • Thunkable is a good choice for individuals or small teams looking to develop apps quickly and without needing to learn complex programming languages. Its simplicity and cross-platform capabilities make it a preferred option for novice developers or educators teaching app development.

Why this product is good

  • Thunkable is a platform that allows users to create mobile applications without extensive coding knowledge. It features a drag-and-drop interface, making it accessible to beginners and those without a technical background. The platform supports both Android and iOS app development from a single project, which saves time and effort. Additionally, Thunkable provides various pre-built components and a community forum for support.

Recommended for

    Beginners in app development, educators introducing app creation, small startups looking for rapid prototyping, and non-technical entrepreneurs interested in building mobile applications.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

EJS
EJS 2 videos + Add
Thunkable 3 videos + Add

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos

  • - JavaScript Templating Tutorial | Introduction To EJS

What is Thunkable X?

More videos

  • - Thunkable vs Kodular: Create Android and iOS Apps without Coding
  • - ProductHunt Review E8 (Reactful, Thunkable, Tster) by Cleveroad Inc

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
EJS
EJS
Thunkable
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
42% 42%
58% 58%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using EJS and Thunkable. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

EJS
EJS no reviews yet
Thunkable no reviews yet

We have no reviews of EJS yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

EJS
EJS 26 mentions
Thunkable 10 mentions
  • Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
    Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

View more

Alternatives to EJS and Thunkable

When comparing EJS and Thunkable, you can also consider the following products.