Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

EJS VS StringTemplate

Compare EJS VS StringTemplate and see what are their differences

EJS logo EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.

StringTemplate logo StringTemplate

StringTemplate is a java template engine for generating source code, web pages, emails, or any other formatted text output.
  • EJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-11
  • StringTemplate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-03

EJS features and specs

  • Simplicity
    EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
  • JavaScript Integration
    Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
  • Lightweight
    EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
  • Flexibility
    Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
  • Partial Templates
    Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages of EJS

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
  • Debugging
    Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
  • Maintenance
    Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
  • Community and Support
    While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.

StringTemplate features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

EJS videos

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JavaScript Templating Tutorial | Introduction To EJS

StringTemplate videos

No StringTemplate videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to EJS and StringTemplate)
Javascript UI Libraries
88 88%
12% 12
Development
84 84%
16% 16
Front-End Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Tool
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using EJS and StringTemplate. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, EJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

EJS mentions (26)

  • Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
    Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it doesn't mention package.json or any of the approaches we've used in this guide. Instead, the examples are in JavaScript and we've advised to add this to our Node application. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even Node.js frameworks that use templating languages like Pug or EJS. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • How to Build an Application With Node.js
    We need a templating engine to render HTML code in the browser using Node.js. We'll use ejs (Embedded JavaScript) for this tutorial but there are others such as Pug (formerly known as Jade) and Express Handlebar, which also render HTML on the server. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Getting to the meat and potatoes of serverless recipe parsing with Amazon Bedrock
    The tags is where you put the HTML you want Claude to read. The <%- document %> contained within is an ejs placeholder. More on this shortly. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

StringTemplate mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of StringTemplate yet. Tracking of StringTemplate recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing EJS and StringTemplate, you can also consider the following products

Mustache.js - Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

Jinja2 - Jinja2 is a template engine written in Python.

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...

Apache Velocity - Velocity is a Java-based template engine.

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Vash - Vash is a template engine that offers a swift flow between code and content using Razor Syntax