Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Mustache.js VS StringTemplate

Compare Mustache.js VS StringTemplate and see what are their differences

Mustache.js logo Mustache.js

Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

StringTemplate logo StringTemplate

StringTemplate is a java template engine for generating source code, web pages, emails, or any other formatted text output.
  • Mustache.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22
  • StringTemplate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-03

Mustache.js features and specs

  • Logic-less Templates
    Mustache.js enforces a logic-less approach to templating, which helps in maintaining separation of concerns by ensuring that templates only concern themselves with presentation and not business logic.
  • Cross-platform Support
    Mustache.js is a JavaScript implementation of the Mustache templating language, which is supported across multiple platforms and languages, making it highly versatile and easy to integrate with various projects.
  • Lightweight
    Mustache.js is a lightweight library with a small footprint, which leads to faster loading times and reduced performance overhead compared to heavier templating engines.
  • Easy to Learn
    The syntax of Mustache is minimalistic and resembles regular HTML, making it easy to learn and adopt, especially for developers familiar with HTML.
  • Prevents Complexity
    By being logic-less, Mustache.js discourages embedding complex logic in templates, which can lead to cleaner and more maintainable codebases.

Possible disadvantages of Mustache.js

  • Limited Logic Handling
    While the logic-less nature of Mustache.js encourages separation of concerns, it can be limiting for developers who need to embed complex logic in their templates, requiring workarounds or supplementary handling in JavaScript.
  • Performance Issues with Large Data
    Mustache.js may encounter performance bottlenecks when rendering large data sets, as the library processes templates and data at runtime.
  • No Built-in Helpers
    Unlike some other templating engines, Mustache.js does not support helpers or custom logic extensions, which can make common tasks cumbersome or require additional code.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Mustache.js lacks some advanced features found in other templating engines, such as conditionals and loops within templates, which can limit its functionality for complex applications.
  • Dependency on External Logic
    Because Mustache.js relies heavily on external data processing, it may lead to scattered business logic across the application that might be difficult to manage as the project grows.

StringTemplate features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Mustache.js videos

Getting started with Mustache.js

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JavaScript and JSON tutorial: JavaScript templating with mustache.js | lynda.com

StringTemplate videos

No StringTemplate videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mustache.js and StringTemplate)
Javascript UI Libraries
77 77%
23% 23
Development
77 77%
23% 23
Frontend Development
100 100%
0% 0
Tool
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Mustache.js and StringTemplate. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Mustache.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mustache.js mentions (12)

  • Documenting my pin collection with Segment Anything: Part 3
    Mustache.js: This is a templating engine used for rendering templates on the web. In your application, Mustache.js is used to dynamically create HTML forms based on the data received from the server, such as image cutouts and identifiers. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • NakedJSX - Use JSX without React
    JSX just a templating language in this case, right? No reactivity at all? What's the benefit against using something like https://github.com/janl/mustache.js/ ? Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Im not sure if im asking the right question here, but how do you create separate pages on a website?
    Nonetheless, I made ridiculous simple MRE(minimal reproducible example) for you: Https://codesandbox.io/s/distracted-gauss-gqfiue You might quickly realize the annoyance of html as strings, move to some template then, e.g: https://handlebarsjs.com/guide/ Also this example uses a library for the routing matching. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Managing application cache with react-query, and code generation.
    Mustache.js is a template engine for creating js templates. Cosmiconfig is a tool to make it convenient to work with the configuration. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • After an eternity, java.com has updated its homepage
    For a small page like that, they are using Oracle content management, knockoutjs, RedwoodJs, MarkedJs, MustacheJs, JQuery and Bootstrap. There's like 10+ layers or div, header and nav elements just to display the logo. They can't even properly anchor the footer at the bottom... Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

StringTemplate mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of StringTemplate yet. Tracking of StringTemplate recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mustache.js and StringTemplate, you can also consider the following products

EJS - An open source JavaScript Template library.

Jinja2 - Jinja2 is a template engine written in Python.

Vash - Vash is a template engine that offers a swift flow between code and content using Razor Syntax

Apache Velocity - Velocity is a Java-based template engine.

FLAVE - Flave was created to bring ASP.

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...