Clearbit
Lusha
Apollo.io
DiscoverOrg
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
ContextForge.dev
Agentmemory
OpenMemory MCP
ContextForge is persistent, searchable memory for AI coding agents โ built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
Your AI assistant forgets everything when the session ends. ContextForge fixes that: save architectural decisions, naming conventions, and debugging context once, and any MCP client recalls it later with semantic search โ across sessions and across projects.
Works with: Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and Windsurf.
Clearbit ContextForge.devContextForge.dev's answer:
ContextForge is memory that lives at the MCP layer, so it works across every AI coding agent at once โ Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and Windsurf โ not just one. Save a decision once and any client recalls it later with semantic search. It goes beyond a note store: automatic git sync turns your commits and PRs into searchable knowledge, plus task tracking, snapshots, and team sharing โ all through a single MCP server you add with one command.
ContextForge.dev's answer:
Most memory tools are tied to a single agent or are just a key-value store. ContextForge is MCP-native, so it's portable across all your AI tools; it adds git sync so your codebase history becomes searchable context automatically; and it includes team features (shared spaces, collaborators) that solo-memory tools lack. Setup is one command, there's a genuine free-forever tier with no credit card, and paid plans start at just $9/month.
ContextForge.dev's answer:
Software developers and engineering teams who use AI coding assistants โ Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, Windsurf โ and are tired of re-explaining their project, architecture, and conventions every session. It fits solo developers working across multiple projects as well as small teams that need shared, persistent context.
ContextForge.dev's answer:
ContextForge was born from a simple frustration: AI coding agents forget everything the moment a session ends. Every new conversation meant re-explaining the same architecture, naming conventions, and past decisions. ContextForge was built to give AI agents a permanent, searchable memory through the Model Context Protocol โ so knowledge is captured once and reused forever, across sessions and projects. It even dogfoods its own memory to help build itself.
ContextForge.dev's answer:
Next.js 16 (App Router), React and Tailwind CSS for the dashboard, hosted on Vercel. Supabase (PostgreSQL) with pgvector powers the semantic vector search, and Deno edge functions serve the API. Embeddings use OpenAI text-embedding-3-small. The MCP client is a Node.js package (contextforge-mcp) on npm, implementing the Model Context Protocol.
Based on our record, Clearbit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug โ legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it canโt handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
Agentmemory - Persistent memory for Claude Code, Codex & coding agents
Apollo.io - Apolloโs predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
OpenMemory MCP - Your private, local memory layer for all AI tools
DiscoverOrg - DiscoverOrg is an IT sales intelligence platform providing technology marketers access to data, IT org charts, and real time projects.
Hunter.io - Find all the email addresses related to a domain