Buildah Reviews

0xProcessing Reviews

1. Barrie Grubb

   · Branch Manager at J & W Carpets · about 2 months ago
   Easy to fit into our existing process

   We were looking for a way to accept crypto payments with no changes to the rest of our workflow. After reviewing payment gateways, 0xProcessing was deemed more feasible than others. The setup was simple and once it ran, never required day-to-day attention. The ability to create payment requests is hassle-free and clear for daily transaction uses; hence, there is no confusion.

   🏁 Competitors: CoinGate, RIZON

   👍 Pros:    Quick to get started|Supports multiple cryptocurrencies|Simple payment request|Clear transaction status

   👎 Cons:    More detailed reporting would be useful|Dashboard customization is limited
2. Cimin Cohen

   · Founder and CEO at Idea Peddler · about 2 months ago
   The goal is to move BitPay in order to utilize it globally.

   Following numerous payment drops and unexpected compliance holds with BitPay, we switched our primary checkout flow to 0xProcessing. Our global clients rely on cross-border technology, services, and products. We needed a payment gateway that is used to handling payment processing and won’t raise flags about something this usual. Actually the onboarding as merchant was quite easy. The API integration into Vettrack’s custom billing stack has taken the dev team the best part of about two afternoons and the docs don’t leave much to the imagination.

   To run its day-to-day operations, Stable is used. We rely heavily on this payment links feature, which is completely automated. The VRCS feature converts incoming volatile assets to stablecoins automatically. The latter aspect alone has given adequate protection to our margins during the dips which get tied up in the afternoon. The 18 supported networks includes nearly everything our clients use. The processing time in so minimal, and we have still yet to have our first chargeback or false fraud flag since we started using it. The interface is effective but has glitches.

   🏁 Competitors: BitPay, CoinGate, RIZON, Coinbase

   👍 Pros:    Vrcs effectively mitigates market volatility risk|Supports a wide range of native tokens and|Transparent fee structure with no hidden billing surprises

   👎 Cons:    Ui dashboard feels overly basic for complex financial analysis|No native fiat payout options available
3. Ahsanul Hasan Amit

   · CEO and Founder at Dream Workers Tech · about 2 months ago
   A practical option for making crypto payments on occasion.

   Since we don't usually process such payments, we weren’t looking for one that was equipped with many sophisticated tools. The first things were reliability and setup that shouldn’t be hard to get used to.

   After looking at a number of options Fireblocks included we found 0xProcessing easier to work with. The on-boarding process was simple and the documentation covered the majority of our needs. It has been doing its job with no additional work since implementation.

   🏁 Competitors: CoinGate, Fireblocks, BitPay

   👍 Pros:    Straightforward on-boarding|Supports several networks|Easy to understand pricing

   👎 Cons:    Limited analytics|Few dashboard customization options

Buildah mentions (14)

• Podman vs. Docker: Containerization Tools Comparison

  Modern Docker releases use BuildKit, an efficient builder developed by Docker, whereas Podman uses Red Hat's Buildah. However, both solutions output OCI-compliant images, so there's no practical difference between the two for standard build workflows. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Dockerfmt: A Dockerfile Formatter

  I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Top 8 Docker Alternatives to Consider in 2025

  Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• How to Create a CI/CD Pipeline with Docker

  Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Ko: Easy Go Containers

  In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

0xProcessing mentions (0)