Based on our record, Podman should be more popular than Buildah. It has been mentiond 125 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Containerize your workflows: Tools like Docker and Podman aren't just for deployment - they make automation more reproducible. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Podman is a popular alternative container tool that acts as a drop-in replacement for Docker. Most Docker commands can be converted to Podman counterparts by simply changing docker to podman. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Since a few years now, we started to design various cli for internal batch usage, on our Java Stack on top of picocli and quarkus, delivered as images, and run on podman. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Docker or Podman for container runtime. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
If you are unfamiliar with the concept of containers and docker images, I suggest you have a look at docker. It will be leveraged here to start the Spark server for the tests; it's important to mention there are other opensource alternatives like podman or nerdctl to allow containerization. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Modern Docker releases use BuildKit, an efficient builder developed by Docker, whereas Podman uses Red Hat's Buildah. However, both solutions output OCI-compliant images, so there's no practical difference between the two for standard build workflows. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
Docker - Docker is an open platform that enables developers and system administrators to create distributed applications.
BuildKit - BuildKit is an open-source toolkit manager application that allows you to build the artifacts in a minimum time frame and helps you to gather the garbage automatically.
Flox - Manage and share development environments with all the frameworks and libraries you need, then publish artifacts anywhere. Harness the power of Nix.
CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes
ZeroVM - ZeroVM is an open source virtualization technology that is based on the Chromium Native Client project.