Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

bacon.js VS RxJS

Compare bacon.js VS RxJS and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

bacon.js logo bacon.js

A small functional reactive programming lib for JavaScript.

RxJS logo RxJS

Reactive Extensions for Javascript
  • bacon.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-17
  • RxJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29

bacon.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

RxJS features and specs

  • Asynchronous Programming Model
    RxJS allows you to work with asynchronous data streams with ease, enabling you to handle events, Ajax requests, and other asynchronous operations more effectively.
  • Composability
    RxJS operators enable developers to compose complex asynchronous operations concisely. This provides greater flexibility and power over handling streams of data.
  • Functional Programming Paradigm
    By using a functional programming approach, RxJS promotes cleaner and more predictable code. It encourages immutability and side-effect-free functions, enhancing code maintainability.
  • Rich Operator Set
    RxJS has a comprehensive set of operators, which allows developers to transform, combine, and filter data streams in various ways without needing to write a lot of boilerplate code.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    With its active community and extensive ecosystem, RxJS provides robust support, an abundance of learning resources, and numerous integrations with other libraries and frameworks.

Possible disadvantages of RxJS

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with reactive programming concepts or functional programming, understanding RxJS can be challenging, potentially leading to difficulty in adopting it.
  • Overhead for Simple Tasks
    Using RxJS for simple asynchronous tasks might add unnecessary complexity compared to native JavaScript promises or async/await due to its powerful abstractions.
  • Bundle Size
    In certain circumstances, incorporating RxJS might lead to increased bundle sizes, which can be a concern for web performance if not managed properly.
  • Complex Debugging
    RxJS introduces a level of abstraction that can make debugging more complex, especially when dealing with multiple combined and transformed data streams.
  • Performance Overhead
    While RxJS is powerful, its generalized approach to handling asynchronous stream processing can introduce performance overhead if not used judiciously.

bacon.js videos

+ Add

Bacon.js for Breakfast: An intro to functional reactive programming

RxJS videos

+ Add

RxJS is My Favorite Library

More videos:

  • Review - Reactive Programming with RxJS - James Churchill
  • Review - Tero Parviainen "Reactive Music Apps in Angular and RxJS"

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to bacon.js and RxJS)

bacon.js

RxJS

Programming Language
100 100%
Programming Language
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
19 19%
Javascript UI Libraries
81% 81
OOP
100 100%
OOP
0% 0
Front-End Frameworks
0 0%
Front-End Frameworks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using bacon.js and RxJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, bacon.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

bacon.js mentions (1)

  • Static code generation DSL.
    It would be awesome to develop something abstract and useful for usage as common PL (besides just solving specific problem), but it's really hard to develop a general purpose language (with memory management, mutations, etc.). For example, at my work I built reactive library mostly similar to Rx.js or Bacon.js, but with additional ability to compose different reactive systems on top of each other, so that... Source: over 3 years ago

RxJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RxJS yet. Tracking of RxJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bacon.js and RxJS, you can also consider the following products

LIPS Scheme - Scheme based powerful lisp interpreter written in JavaScript

Zustand - Bear necessities for state management in React

Chicken - A portable and efficient cross-platform Scheme implementation that compiles to C.

MobX - Simple, scalable state management

Racket Lang - Racket (formerly PLT Scheme) is a modern programming language in the Lisp/Scheme family, suitable...

Redux.js - Predictable state container for JavaScript apps

Loading...