bacon.js VS RxJS

Compare bacon.js VS RxJS and see what are their differences

DocRaptor

As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

bacon.js

A small functional reactive programming lib for JavaScript.

RxJS

Reactive Extensions for Javascript

Landing page //
2019-09-17

Landing page //
2023-09-29

Bacon.js for Breakfast: An intro to functional reactive programming

RxJS videos

+ Add

RxJS is My Favorite Library

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to bacon.js and RxJS)

bacon.js

RxJS

Javascript UI Libraries

26 26%

Javascript UI Libraries

74% 74

Front-End Frameworks

26 26%

Front-End Frameworks

74% 74

JS Library

27 27%

JS Library

73% 73

Programming Language

100 100%

Programming Language

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using bacon.js and RxJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, bacon.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

bacon.js mentions (1)

Static code generation DSL.
It would be awesome to develop something abstract and useful for usage as common PL (besides just solving specific problem), but it's really hard to develop a general purpose language (with memory management, mutations, etc.). For example, at my work I built reactive library mostly similar to Rx.js or Bacon.js, but with additional ability to compose different reactive systems on top of each other, so that... Source: over 2 years ago