Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LIPS Scheme VS RxJS

Compare LIPS Scheme VS RxJS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

LIPS Scheme logo LIPS Scheme

Scheme based powerful lisp interpreter written in JavaScript

RxJS logo RxJS

Reactive Extensions for Javascript
  • LIPS Scheme Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-13
  • RxJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29

LIPS Scheme features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

RxJS features and specs

  • Asynchronous Programming Model
    RxJS allows you to work with asynchronous data streams with ease, enabling you to handle events, Ajax requests, and other asynchronous operations more effectively.
  • Composability
    RxJS operators enable developers to compose complex asynchronous operations concisely. This provides greater flexibility and power over handling streams of data.
  • Functional Programming Paradigm
    By using a functional programming approach, RxJS promotes cleaner and more predictable code. It encourages immutability and side-effect-free functions, enhancing code maintainability.
  • Rich Operator Set
    RxJS has a comprehensive set of operators, which allows developers to transform, combine, and filter data streams in various ways without needing to write a lot of boilerplate code.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    With its active community and extensive ecosystem, RxJS provides robust support, an abundance of learning resources, and numerous integrations with other libraries and frameworks.

Possible disadvantages of RxJS

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with reactive programming concepts or functional programming, understanding RxJS can be challenging, potentially leading to difficulty in adopting it.
  • Overhead for Simple Tasks
    Using RxJS for simple asynchronous tasks might add unnecessary complexity compared to native JavaScript promises or async/await due to its powerful abstractions.
  • Bundle Size
    In certain circumstances, incorporating RxJS might lead to increased bundle sizes, which can be a concern for web performance if not managed properly.
  • Complex Debugging
    RxJS introduces a level of abstraction that can make debugging more complex, especially when dealing with multiple combined and transformed data streams.
  • Performance Overhead
    While RxJS is powerful, its generalized approach to handling asynchronous stream processing can introduce performance overhead if not used judiciously.

LIPS Scheme videos

No LIPS Scheme videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

RxJS videos

RxJS is My Favorite Library

More videos:

  • Review - Reactive Programming with RxJS - James Churchill
  • Review - Tero Parviainen "Reactive Music Apps in Angular and RxJS"

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LIPS Scheme and RxJS)
Programming Language
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
OOP
100 100%
0% 0
Front-End Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LIPS Scheme and RxJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, LIPS Scheme seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LIPS Scheme mentions (9)

  • PyScript: An open source platform for Python in the browser
    >> What other language would people choose in a browser? Lua? Brendan Eich originally wanted to use Scheme. There are some Scheme in Javascript implementations: https://www.biwascheme.org/ https://lips.js.org/ https://www.wescheme.org/ https://web.scheme.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • (Learn 'Scheme)
    Sweet, I'll have to give that a go :) Another option in browser land is lips[0], which exclusively targets a js backend. [0] https://lips.js.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • All Web frontend lisp projects
    For Scheme implementations there are LIPS and biwascheme. I haven't done more than play around with them, so I can't really give an informed opinion about pros and cons or favorites. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What other Scheme parser tricks do you know?
    In my interpreter, LIPS Scheme, vector literal syntax is created using a syntax extension, a token that is mapped to a function or a macro. So you can use things like this:. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How to list defined symbols?
    I'm not sure about other Scheme interpreters but in my interpreter LIPS Scheme, there is (env) function that returns a list of symbols. You can also access environment objects e.g. (current-environment) return object that is used internally. And you can even access the scope chain because the env object has __parent__ property that returns the parent scope. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

RxJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RxJS yet. Tracking of RxJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LIPS Scheme and RxJS, you can also consider the following products

bacon.js - A small functional reactive programming lib for JavaScript.

Zustand - Bear necessities for state management in React

TinyScheme - D. Souflis, J. Shapiro - TinyScheme Download site

MobX - Simple, scalable state management

MIT Scheme - Implementation of Scheme providing an interpreter, compiler, source-code debugger, integrated Emacs-like editor, and a large run-time library

Redux.js - Predictable state container for JavaScript apps