
SCI-HUB
Google Scholar
PubMed.gov
Unpaywall
Archive.org
Z-Lib
Papers with Code
arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for scholarly articles.

Tailwind UI
DaisyUI
Float UI
Tailwind CSS
TailGrids
Preline UI
Keep Design System
Build UI interfaces and simplify the process of integrating into live websites with Tailwind CSS
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, arXiv seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 334 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | arxiv.org | flowbite.design |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Students, researchers, and academics in scientific fields who are looking for early access to research outputs or wish to publish their own preprints for peer feedback. It's also beneficial for anyone interested in staying up-to-date with cutting-edge developments in science and technology.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How to submit a paper to arxiv
More videos
The ULTIMATE Figma UI Kit (Flowbite)
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using arXiv and FlowBite. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of arXiv yet. Be the first one to post
Flowbite is a UI component library built on top of Tailwind CSS, offering interactive elements such as dropdowns, modals, and navbars to enhance user interfaces.
Flowbite has over 450 components; the documentation has component code for HTML with options to install as a library for the most popular frameworks. The project has over 2,800 stars on GitHub and gets around 50,000...
In addition to hundreds of developed pages and Tailwind components, such as application UI, marketing UI, and e-commerce layouts, Flowbite’s pro edition includes a Figma design system based on Tailwind CSS utility...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


The evaluation landscape for AI agents saw 45+ new research papers in the past 6 months on arXiv (Cornell University's open-access preprint repository), proposing new metrics for trajectory quality (TRACE), hallucination detection (LSC),... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
I depend heavily on arxiv papers for this. Using a SERP API (Bright Data) for Google, running site:arxiv.org plus a well-framed query gets me recent, relevant papers. I’d run four or five of these, collate the results…and then inevitably... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
ArXiv — Repositorio del paper "Spec-Driven Development: From Code to Contract in the Age of AI" (enero 2026). - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Tracking FlowBite since Sep 2021.
When comparing arXiv and FlowBite, you can also consider the following products.

It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
Compare SCI-HUB to arXiv or FlowBite:

Beautiful UI components by the creators of Tailwind CSS.
Compare Tailwind UI to arXiv or FlowBite:

Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...
Compare Google Scholar to arXiv or FlowBite:


PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
Compare PubMed.gov to arXiv or FlowBite:

Beautiful and responsive UI components and templates for React and Vue with Tailwind CSS.
Compare Float UI to arXiv or FlowBite: