Open Access
arXiv offers free access to a wide range of scientific papers, providing open access to high-quality research without paywalls.
Rapid Dissemination
Researchers can quickly share their findings with the global community, potentially accelerating scientific progress.
Large Repository
With millions of papers in various fields such as physics, computer science, and mathematics, arXiv is a comprehensive resource for researchers.
Preprints
Authors can share their manuscripts before formal peer review, which allows for immediate feedback and increased visibility.
Community and Collaborations
arXiv fosters a collaborative environment where researchers can easily find and build on each other's work.
Yes, arXiv is considered good, especially for academics and researchers who need access to the latest research developments or want to share their work broadly and promptly.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if arXiv is good.
Check the traffic stats of arXiv on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of arXiv on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of arXiv's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of arXiv on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about arXiv on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
The evaluation landscape for AI agents saw 45+ new research papers in the past 6 months on arXiv (Cornell University's open-access preprint repository), proposing new metrics for trajectory quality (TRACE), hallucination detection (LSC), and cost-performance tradeoffs (KAMI). But when it comes to implementing these evaluations, which framework should you use? - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
I depend heavily on arxiv papers for this. Using a SERP API (Bright Data) for Google, running site:arxiv.org plus a well-framed query gets me recent, relevant papers. Iโd run four or five of these, collate the resultsโฆand then inevitably get bogged down scrolling JSON, opening new tabs, running grep. Just godawful UX for what is, at its core, a search problem (not data). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
ArXiv โ Repositorio del paper "Spec-Driven Development: From Code to Contract in the Age of AI" (enero 2026). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Research shows that hallucinations remain prevalent in complex reasoning and open-domain factual recall, where error rates can exceed 33%. In a customer-facing application, that is not a product quirk. That is a liability. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
This guide synthesizes the technical depth of Unsloth, the security perspective of Lakera, and the academic rigor of the arXiv comprehensive survey โ with an enterprise decision framework and cost analysis that none of them provide. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
UC Berkeley MAST Framework โ Analysis of 1,600+ Agent traces showing 41โ86.7% multi-Agent failure rates, with 79% of failures from orchestration. arxiv.org. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
I got a kindle Scribe which can load PDF, HTML and text files via iPhone Kindle App and read offline. Since most pre-1925 books are out of copyright and free on https://gutenberg.org, ACM is open access (https://dl.acm.org/) and we have open https://arxiv.org/, it is the golden age for readers seeking original content. We donโt need bots to read for us. We can live in the mind of human writers. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
The usual way this works is, you retain rights to the preprint. That's what preprint repositories like https://arxiv.org/ are for. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Kernel rootkits can hide whatever they need, but the common functionality is also to hide data from /proc. That's why netstat, ps, *top or lsof are not reliable tools if the system is compromised. Ss is a bit different and is a bit more reliable. In this case, snitch is written in Go, which doesn't use the libc functions, so probably it'll be able to obtain information from /proc even if hidden by a LD_PRELOAD... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
โXAI meets LLMs: A Survey of the Relation between Explainable AI and Large Language Modelsโ โ Available at arxiv.org, provides comprehensive overview of the intersection between explainable AI and large language models, examining how conversational capabilities can enhance AI explanation systems. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
ArXiv. โCatastrophic Liability: Managing Systemic Risks in Frontier AI Development.โ Available at: arxiv.org. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
TAMA: A Human-AI Collaborative Thematic Analysis Framework Using Multi-Agent LLMs for Clinical Research. arXiv. Available at: https://arxiv.org. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Https://arxiv.org (many fields) or https://eprint.iacr.org (cryptography). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
As a Ph.D. Student studying Deep Learning (DL) from the perspective of a Software Engineer, I rely upon academic resources to learn about DL models, techniques, and methods. Arxiv is arguably the largest host of the latest academic (but not peer-reviewed) DL manuscripts. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
To answer the above questions, you can check excellent resources like Hugging Face and Arxiv.org. Also, Open LLm Leaderboard and LMSYS Chatbot Arena provide detailed information and benchmarks for varieties of LLMs. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Would it be better to post the paper on https://arxiv.org/ or speak with your local university mathematics department. These would be far more qualified to assess a proof than HN. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
If st.button('Search for Papers'): with st. Spinner ('Searching and Processing...'): relevant memories = memory.search(search_query, user_id=user_id, limit=3) prompt = f "Search for arXiv papers: {search_query}\nUser background: {' '.join(mem['text'] for mem in relevant_memories)}" result = process_with_gpt4 (multion.browse (cmd=prompt, url="https://arxiv.org/")) st.markdown (result). - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
One of the things that stands in the way of this (for me) is that I've been out of academia for nearly ten years. I never even got verified for submitting CS pre-prints https://arxiv.org/ for example, which I should have done before leaving school. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
. TechCrunch: Covers the latest technology news, including AI developments. . MIT Technology Review: Provides in-depth articles on emerging technologies. . Towards Data Science: Offers insights and tutorials on data science and AI. . ArXiv.org: Hosts preprints of research papers across various fields, including AI. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Iโm also curious about the role decentralized, open knowledge bases might play as a counterweight to AI-driven narrowing. Could initiatives like Wikidata, arXiv, or IPFS provide a bulwark against knowledge collapse by making marginal information more accessible? Thereโs lots of room for further work here. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Just read some AI papers on https://arxiv.org , that will give you an idea(but don't worry too much, they probably used some AI in the making of those papers, lol). But as soon the next generation of AI is out (the next step in AI), everything will change again. Source: over 2 years ago
Do you know an article comparing arXiv to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is arXiv good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss arXiv here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.