Apache HTTP Server VS Cockpit Project

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

Cockpit Project Reviews

Apache HTTP Server mentions (50)

• The 2024 Web Hosting Report

  Single-page applications (SPAs) existed before S3, but given that you still had to set up, scale, and maintain servers using something like Apache or NGINX in order to serve them, the advantages for “Ops” or “DevOps” were not so different to running a “real server” with a language like PHP, python, or Java. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  Both Docusaurus and Starlight generate static sites. This means that theoretically, they can be deployed on any platform that supports deploying static sites (like Apache or NGINX). But both of them provide a significantly better developer experience if we deploy on their recommended platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• BCHS stack: BSD, C, httpd, SQLite

  Simiplicity is nice, but there are reasons why Perl and PHP were the popular choices for web stacks in the early 2000's--they are faster and easier to develop with than C and likely safer than C too. Mod_perl (https://perl.apache.org/) and mod_php (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=115522403#content/view/115522403) helped to make Apache httpd (https://httpd.apache.org/) the... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Apache HTTP Server: An Overview of the Open Source Web Server for Multiple Platforms

  The Apache HTTP Server project was initially launched in 1995 by a group of web developers and administrators who sought to improve upon the existing web server software available at the time. The project has since evolved into a collaborative effort, with contributors from around the world working together to maintain and enhance the server. Today, the Apache HTTP Server is managed by the Apache Software... Source: about 1 year ago

• Selfmade PVE-Rack

  Apache websites of friends and acquaintances. Source: about 1 year ago

Cockpit Project mentions (166)

• OS question for new build DIY Nas

  I would personally prefer a hypervisor as the base OS and VMs for every role, like separate VM for NAS functionality, separate VM for media, etc. As per hypervisor, I would recommend taking a look at Proxmox as a good enough Linux-based and low-resource demanding hypervisor. Another Linux option would be pure KVM on any Linux distro you like + Cockpit and Cockpit machines (https://cockpit-project.org/) to manage VMs. Source: 5 months ago

• Looking for a webinterface to controll server/nas/linux box

  See title, and I prefer a interface thats opensource. I want to setup my nas system, controll services and maybe do terminal work aswell. Ive experimented with cockpit ( https://cockpit-project.org/ ) wondered if there are better or different tools out there. They have plugins I like but also mis. No minecraft stuff, no vm controll (They dropper docker for something else) Redhat ?!? Source: 7 months ago

• How to manage local logs

  No problem, journald is in fact structured logging and it provides all you need to do efficient searching, correlation and archival. There is actually a nice web interface too as part of cockpit-project.org although it is nothing like Kibana of course. Source: 10 months ago

• Light weight server management for a Linux cluster

  Cockpit. Is the took you're looking for. Source: 10 months ago

• Ubuntu Server 22.04 slow and laggy

  While people here are correct in terms of Aspeed GPU performance and main usage, you can also check for CPU spikes if there are any. What is the main purpose of the server, and why do you need GUI on the server installation? If you need it just for easy monitoring, you can install cockpit (https://cockpit-project.org/). Source: 11 months ago