User-Friendly Interface
Cockpit provides a web-based user interface that simplifies server management tasks. It is intuitive and easy to use, even for those who may not have deep system administration experience.
Real-Time Monitoring
Cockpit offers real-time monitoring of system resources and performance. This allows administrators to quickly identify and address potential issues as they arise.
Multi-Server Management
With Cockpit, users can manage multiple servers from a single dashboard. This is particularly useful for administrators who manage complex environments with numerous servers.
Linux Integration
Cockpit is well-integrated with Linux systems and supports various distributions like Fedora, RHEL, CentOS, and Ubuntu. It takes advantage of existing system APIs and commands, making it very efficient.
Lightweight
Cockpit is lightweight and does not consume significant system resources. It runs only on demand, minimizing its impact on the server.
Open Source
Being an open-source project, Cockpit allows customization and community contributions. This leads to continuous improvement and the addition of new features.
Promote Cockpit Project. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Overall, the Cockpit Project is a good choice for those looking to manage Linux servers through a web-based interface. It strikes a balance between simplicity and functionality, making it a reliable tool for monitoring and managing servers.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Cockpit Project is good.
Check the traffic stats of Cockpit Project on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Cockpit Project on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Cockpit Project's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Cockpit Project on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Cockpit Project on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Probably the closest thing that already exists is just running Cockpit[1]. 45Drives even maintains some helpful storage and file sharing plugins for it[2], though some of those are only compatible with x86 for now. [1] https://cockpit-project.org [2] https://github.com/45Drives?q=cockpit. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Do we really need another GUI for kvm/qemu? I was thinking that https://cockpit-project.org cover the idea to develop something like Karton, but who am I to think so =). - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
You can get the info about cockpit on the official website. But, the most convenient way to configure it is here in this blog. So, without wasting any second, let’s start with the practical. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I would personally prefer a hypervisor as the base OS and VMs for every role, like separate VM for NAS functionality, separate VM for media, etc. As per hypervisor, I would recommend taking a look at Proxmox as a good enough Linux-based and low-resource demanding hypervisor. Another Linux option would be pure KVM on any Linux distro you like + Cockpit and Cockpit machines (https://cockpit-project.org/) to manage VMs. Source: almost 2 years ago
See title, and I prefer a interface thats opensource. I want to setup my nas system, controll services and maybe do terminal work aswell. Ive experimented with cockpit ( https://cockpit-project.org/ ) wondered if there are better or different tools out there. They have plugins I like but also mis. No minecraft stuff, no vm controll (They dropper docker for something else) Redhat ?!? Source: almost 2 years ago
No problem, journald is in fact structured logging and it provides all you need to do efficient searching, correlation and archival. There is actually a nice web interface too as part of cockpit-project.org although it is nothing like Kibana of course. Source: about 2 years ago
Cockpit. Is the took you're looking for. Source: about 2 years ago
While people here are correct in terms of Aspeed GPU performance and main usage, you can also check for CPU spikes if there are any. What is the main purpose of the server, and why do you need GUI on the server installation? If you need it just for easy monitoring, you can install cockpit (https://cockpit-project.org/). Source: over 2 years ago
They kindly and quickly did it with only requirement on my end was to start fresh. Then I figured I would give cockpit-project.org a try while I am at it. Which I fell in love especially with it's clear dark theming and vivid text and graphs. As a visually impaired person those changes are very helpful! Source: about 2 years ago
If you want to tinker, go with Debian as the core OS and KVM as the hypervisor. Drop cockpit (https://cockpit-project.org/) as management and here you go. Source: over 2 years ago
I would rather recommend community-driven Debian over Ubuntu, but it is fine. What you can do, is start by installing the KVM hypervisor (unless you are going to run the ARMA server in docker) and install Cockpit for web management (https://cockpit-project.org/). This will be enough to start the config. Source: over 2 years ago
Since you are going to use SSH, just deploy Debian or Alma, and here you go. Install Cockpit for web management later on if you need it (https://cockpit-project.org/). Source: over 2 years ago
There is no such thing as an ideal OS. Some of the products are better in some of the areas, while other software is better in other areas. For example, Proxmox is the virtualization platform that is targeting virtualization needs. It has support for software RAID, but it doesn't mean that this is the primary feature that is constantly developed. Any NAS OS basically doing the same but targeting storage and... Source: over 2 years ago
But, for servers, I tend to just use Cockpit, which is a system administration Web-UI that includes tools for administering containers. It works with socket activation, so it doesn't use any resources unless you connect to it. Source: over 2 years ago
I’ve used cockpit web console project for ssh web gui. https://cockpit-project.org/ Then Cloudflare with email whitelist code verification. Source: over 2 years ago
Setup a vm with something like fedora server (which comes with https://cockpit-project.org/ preinstalled) + tmux. Source: over 2 years ago
Ubuntu is fine. Just install KVM to run VMs, docker to run containers, and cockpit project (https://cockpit-project.org/) to manage everything. Source: over 2 years ago
I also use Ubuntu Server LTS in all my machines and it works perfectly fine, just install some utilities, check out RHEL Web Console for Ubuntu (aka cockpit) https://cockpit-project.org/ and the VM plugin (aka cockpit-machines), there is also a plugin to run containers and pods (aka cockpit-podman). You can also install MAAS https://maas.io/ wich is more related to Canonical/Ubuntu itself and uses LXC/LXD to do... Source: over 2 years ago
Install KVM + Cockpit (https://cockpit-project.org/). Try both VMs and Docker/LXC. Decide which is better for you. Source: over 2 years ago
If you need VMs, you can keep your Ubuntu server. Install KVM on it and Cockpit (https://cockpit-project.org/), and use both VMs and Docker in your current deployment. Source: over 2 years ago
Both OpenVPN Access Server and CloudConnexa has easy setup tools available when using OpenVPN 3 Linux, via openvpn3-as, openvpn-connector-setup and the OpenVPN Connector package for Cockpit. Source: over 2 years ago
The Cockpit Project has garnered a varied response among the community of system administrators and tech enthusiasts, particularly those in the Linux ecosystem. As a web-based graphical interface for server management, it is frequently mentioned in discussions surrounding alternatives to well-known control panels such as cPanel, Webmin, and VestaCP.
Cockpit is praised for its lightweight and user-friendly interface, designed to ease system administration tasks. Its web-based nature allows users to manage Linux servers remotely, offering features such as storage management, service control, and log monitoring. The inclusion of a journal interface is appreciated, as it offers a structured logging mechanism akin to journald, albeit not as robust as tools like Kibana.
Primarily backed by Red Hat, Cockpit is recognized for its stability and the frequency of its updates. Its target demographic is primarily small to medium-sized enterprises rather than individual web-hosting solutions. Many users assert that while it is intuitive enough for novices, some functionalities—like virtualization management using plugins such as Cockpit Machines—cater more towards those who are comfortable with terminal-level CLI operations. That said, its ability to serve both advanced users and beginners makes it quite versatile.
Feedback within forums reveals that users appreciate Cockpit's integration capabilities for RAID backups, virtualization (KVM), and file sharing. It's often compared to other tools like Proxmox and OpenMediaVault, particularly for virtualization and storage management. A common sentiment is that while Proxmox and other dedicated tools might offer deeper functionality in these domains, Cockpit provides a commendable balance of simplicity and power.
The open-source nature and the plugin ecosystem of Cockpit are highlighted, offering modularity and customizability. This flexibility, alongside its clean and dark-themed UI, garners appreciation, especially among visually impaired users.
Despite its strengths, Cockpit is sometimes noted for lacking certain advanced features available in other control panels, such as comprehensive Minecraft server support or more elaborate VM management features. It was highlighted that Cockpit dropped Docker support in favor of Podman, which might not resonate with every user.
Moreover, some discussions point out its limitations compared to GUI-based alternatives designed specifically for managing KVM and QEMU virtual machines, such as Karton under KDE. The sentiment here underscores a demand for specialization in particular use cases.
In summary, the Cockpit Project offers a robust, adaptable, and user-friendly entry point into server management, especially for users familiar with or willing to engage in command-line operations. It holds particular appeal for small to medium-sized businesses and individual administrators looking for a lightweight and modular framework to manage Linux environments.
While it may not completely replace more specialized management solutions, its balance of usability, flexibility, and community-driven enhancements make it a compelling choice for a broad range of users interested in effective, web-based system management.
Do you know an article comparing Cockpit Project to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Cockpit Project good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Cockpit Project here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
