Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache CXF VS ScreenshotAPI.net

Compare Apache CXF VS ScreenshotAPI.net and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index

ScreenshotAPI.net logo ScreenshotAPI.net

Generate beautiful website screenshots using our fast website screenshot API.
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29
  • ScreenshotAPI.net Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-10

Use a simple API call to take pixel-perfect screenshots of any website.

ScreenshotAPI.net

$ Details
freemium $5.0 / Monthly (1,000 screenshots per month.)
Release Date
2019 September

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

ScreenshotAPI.net features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    ScreenshotAPI.net provides a straightforward interface that makes it easy to capture screenshots by sending simple HTTP requests.
  • Customization Options
    It offers various customization settings such as viewport size, full-page captures, and user-agent settings, allowing users to tailor screenshots according to their needs.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The API can be easily integrated with different programming languages and frameworks, enabling seamless use in diverse projects.
  • Automated Screenshots
    Supports automated and scheduled screenshot captures, which are useful for regular monitoring and reporting tasks.
  • Global Rendering
    Provides the ability to render web pages from different geographic locations, which is beneficial for testing localized content.

Possible disadvantages of ScreenshotAPI.net

  • Subscription Costs
    While there is a free plan, more advanced features and higher usage limits require a subscription, which might be costly for some users.
  • Rate Limits
    There are limits on the number of requests that can be made depending on the subscription plan, which can be a constraint for high-volume users.
  • Dependency on API
    Reliance on an external service means any downtime or service issues on ScreenshotAPI.netโ€™s side can impact users' operations.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Use Cases
    While the basic functions are easy to use, more advanced configurations or integrations might require a deeper understanding of the API.
  • Privacy Concerns
    When using a third-party service, there may be concerns regarding data handling, especially when capturing sensitive or private content.

Apache CXF videos

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

ScreenshotAPI.net videos

No ScreenshotAPI.net videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache CXF and ScreenshotAPI.net)
Developer Tools
62 62%
38% 38
Website Screenshots
0 0%
100% 100
Ruby Web Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Screenshots
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache CXF and ScreenshotAPI.net. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache CXF and ScreenshotAPI.net

Apache CXF Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache CXF yet.
Be the first one to post

ScreenshotAPI.net Reviews

  1. Great service

    Works as it should!


Choosing the Best Screenshot API in 2025: A Developerโ€™s Guide
ScreenshotAPI keeps things simple and cost-effective. Itโ€™s a good entry-level option for developers who just need basic screenshot capture without complex infrastructure or anti-bot features.
Source: dev.to

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache CXF should be more popular than ScreenshotAPI.net. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Whatโ€™s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

ScreenshotAPI.net mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache CXF and ScreenshotAPI.net, you can also consider the following products

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

ScreenshotOne - Fast and reliable screenshot API built to handle millions of screenshots a month.

PhotoSwipe - JavaScript gallery, no dependencies.

ApiFlash - ApiFlash is a powerful serverless screenshot API built with Chromium and AWS Lambda. It can easily scale to millions of screenshots per day and has an ever growing number of satisfied big clients.

Sinatra - Classy web-development dressed in a DSL

Urlbox - Screenshot full page websites in retina resolution with Urlbox.io screenshot as a service API. Urlbox is the best provider of automated website screenshots offering many unique options and features.