Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache CXF VS ASocks

Compare Apache CXF VS ASocks and see what are their differences

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index

ASocks logo ASocks

Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price.
Visit Website
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29
  • ASocks Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-17

ASocks is a provider of qualitative and fast proxy servers with their own infrastructure. We offer you real residential proxies at the lowest price: 3$ per 1 GB.

ASocks

Website
asocks.com
$ Details
paid Free Trial $3.0 (3$ per 1 Gb)
Platforms
Amazon eBay Zonnolab Multilogin RBtools Steam Twitter Telegram Yandex Facebook Facebook Messenger Instagram TikTok LinkedIn Viber YouTube Twitch

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

ASocks features and specs

  • HTTP
  • Socks5
  • ASN targeting
  • Pay as you go
  • Automatic activation
  • 24/7 technical support
  • IPv4

Analysis of ASocks

Overall verdict

  • Good

Why this product is good

  • ASocks is considered reliable by many for its fast and secure proxy services, offering a wide range of residential and data center proxy options. Users often appreciate its ease of use, quality customer support, and the ability to handle high request volumes. Additionally, ASocks provides good geo-targeting capabilities, which is beneficial for tasks requiring location-specific data access.

Recommended for

  • Web scraping professionals who need reliable and fast proxies
  • Businesses requiring geo-targeted data collection
  • Individuals seeking secure and anonymous web browsing
  • Developers looking for easy-to-integrate proxy solutions

Apache CXF videos

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

ASocks videos

Asocks Proxy Site Review||The Most Stable And The Most Reliable 4G Mobile & Residential Proxies

More videos:

  • Review - IPFighter| Review Asocks Proxy
  • Review - Best Residential Proxies Website 2024 | ASocks 7000,000+ IPs from Europe Loading High CPC Proxy

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache CXF and ASocks)
Developer Tools
5 5%
95% 95
Web Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
100% 100
Ruby Web Framework
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache CXF and ASocks. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache CXF and ASocks

Apache CXF Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache CXF yet.
Be the first one to post

ASocks Reviews

  1. I am very happy!

    I have worked with many services that provide proxies, but asocks stands out among them. Responsive support managers, user-friendly interface, nice prices. I am very happy!

    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Great customer support|Good price|Quality
  2. Best Proxy Service

    Good service with loads of countries to choose from, very inexpensive compared to other providers, I like that you pay as you go, no need for expensive subscriptions. If you need a proxy from time to time Asocks is the way to go. No captcha and fast servers. Highly recommend it.

    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Web traffic
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    Data protection and security
  3. nettlillian
    Amazing!

    I have used other services before but that service is just amazing. Great support + amazing options on the website how to create individual proxy. I just can recommend this service to anyone.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache CXF seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Whatโ€™s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

ASocks mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ASocks yet. Tracking of ASocks recommendations started around Oct 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache CXF and ASocks, you can also consider the following products

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Bright Data - World's largest proxy service with a residential proxy network of 72M IPs worldwide and proxy management interface for zero coding.

PhotoSwipe - JavaScript gallery, no dependencies.

Smartproxy - Smartproxy is perhaps the most user-friendly way to access local data anywhere. It has global coverage with 195 locations, offers more than 55M residential proxies worldwide and a great deal of scraping solutions.

Sinatra - Classy web-development dressed in a DSL

Oxylabs - A web intelligence collection platform and premium proxy provider, enabling companies of all sizes to utilize the power of big data.