This page is designed to help you find out whether Puma is good and if it is the right choice for you.
Listed in
High Performance
Puma is designed to be a concurrent and highly performant Ruby HTTP server, allowing it to handle multiple requests at the same time efficiently.
Threaded Model
Puma uses a threaded model, which can be more memory-efficient than a forking model, leading to lower memory consumption and better resource management.
Scalability
Puma can handle a large number of concurrent connections by utilizing multiple threads and workers, making it suitable for high-traffic web applications.
Cluster Mode
Puma supports cluster mode, which allows it to run multiple worker processes to take advantage of multi-core systems, improving performance and reliability.
Support for Rack Applications
Puma is compatible with Rack-compliant applications, making it a good choice for hosting Ruby web applications developed using various frameworks like Rails or Sinatra.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Puma is good.
Check the traffic stats of Puma on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Puma on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Puma's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Puma on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Puma on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: over 4 years ago
Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Puma to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Puma good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Puma here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.