Table of contents
Comprehensive Search
MetaCrawler aggregates results from multiple search engines, providing a broader range of search results and potentially more diverse content.
Efficient Searching
By collating results from different sources, users can save time by not having to search each engine individually.
Relevancy of Results
The aggregation process helps to filter out less relevant results, allowing users to access content that is more likely to meet their needs.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if MetaCrawler is good.
Check the traffic stats of MetaCrawler on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of MetaCrawler on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of MetaCrawler's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of MetaCrawler on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about MetaCrawler on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
I'm not sure how much the current metacrawler.com has in common with the older versions, but it does seem to work quite well. Source: almost 3 years ago
Nice. Earlier this week after trying a fairly simple search query that would have been a cinch to find actual web pages that talked about my topic, Google, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, all failed big time. I mean, the majority of the first twenty results didn't even contain my first search term. I went looking for "old school" search engines that might still adhere to boolean search rules, and most of the classics either no... Source: almost 3 years ago
MetaCrawler has a storied history as an early entrant in the search engine space. Initially launched as a meta search engine under the InfoSpace umbrella, MetaCrawler was designed to aggregate search results from multiple mainstream search engines such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo. Over time, MetaCrawler has evolved, and its current iteration continues to serve as a niche tool that complements broader search needs by providing aggregated search results from several sources.
Public sentiment towards MetaCrawler can be characterized by both nostalgia and practicality. For some long-time internet users, MetaCrawler represents a return to the classic, straightforward search experience. This nostalgia is evident from discussions on platforms such as Reddit, where some users recall using MetaCrawler in an era preceding the dominance of current major search engines.
Recent comments suggest that MetaCrawler continues to perform effectively, particularly in situations where mainstream engines falter. Users have expressed frustration with the relevance and accuracy of results from dominant engines like Google and Bing, often leading them to MetaCrawler as an alternative in search of more reliable outputs. Specifically, MetaCrawler gains recognition when newer engines fail to adhere to traditional search principles, such as Boolean logic.
Despite its nostalgic appeal, MetaCrawler remains relevant in its category of online services, particularly as a search engine aggregator. It provides added value by delivering diversified search results, which may appeal to users dissatisfied with the algorithms deployed by stand-alone search engines. This hybrid function positions MetaCrawler as a valuable tool for users searching for a more refined approach to browsing, one that makes use of multiple sources to deliver comprehensive search results.
In comparison to its competitors, MetaCrawler stands in a unique position. While Disconnect Search and DuckDuckGo emphasize privacy, and Mojeek focuses on ethical searching practices with its independent index, MetaCrawler differentiates itself by its foundational meta search functionality. It shares this aggregation aspect with Excite and WebCrawler but has managed to maintain a simpler, more user-focused interface.
Though utilities like Swisscows and lingvist.info are included in the category of competitors, their niche specializations in privacy and language translation respectively delineate their primary audience away from traditional search aggregation.
MetaCrawler continues to hold a distinctive place in the search engine landscape. It serves an audience that values a blend of simplicity and diversity in search results, particularly when existing mainstream options fall short. While it does not enjoy the ubiquity or massive user base of larger search engines, its resilience and functionality uphold its status as a viable alternative for those seeking insights from varied search engines. Consequently, MetaCrawler remains a tool appreciated for its ability to provide a collective view of search results, bridging gaps left by newer algorithms and meeting the needs of a discerning search audience.
Do you know an article comparing MetaCrawler to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is MetaCrawler good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss MetaCrawler here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
