Yjs VS Split Fee
Compare Yjs VS Split Fee and see what are their differences
Automated 60-second forensic business auditing pipeline powered by OpenAI Nano AI. Built for consultants and analysts.
featured
Yjs
GUN
RxDB
Liveblocks
Reflect.net
Thymer
ShareDB
Automerge
Split Fee
Unbench
Split Fee is a platform for UK recruitment agencies to collaborate on permanent placements.
Every agency has candidates they can't place and vacancies they can't fill. Another agency almost certainly has what you need โ but finding them, trusting them, and making the collaboration work has always been the hard part.
Split Fee solves this. Post your candidates and vacancies to the platform. Our matching algorithm finds opportunities across every agency on the network โ by skills, location, salary, and seniority. Candidate and client data stays anonymised until both sides agree to work together. When a placement is made, we handle the fee split and invoicing automatically.
No more posting in social media groups and hoping someone replies. No more sharing candidate details with strangers on trust alone. No more chasing invoices from agencies you barely know.
45% for you. 45% for them. 10% platform fee โ only when a placement is made.
Half of a placement fee is infinitely better than none of it.
Yjs Split FeeNo features have been listed yet.
Split Fee's answer:
A next-generation serverless platform, built for AWS.
Split Fee's answer:
Split Fee is the first purpose-built platform for split fee recruitment in the UK. Instead of relying on LinkedIn groups, WhatsApp messages, and manual agreements, agencies upload their candidates and vacancies and the platform automatically matches them across agencies.
Candidate identities are revealed gradually; anonymised at first, then progressively disclosed as both sides accept, so agencies can collaborate without the risk of circumvention.
Split Fee's answer:
Most "split fee networks" are just directories or social groups where agencies post and hope someone responds. Split Fee is an actual matching engine. It scores candidate-vacancy pairs, handles the legal agreements (non-circumvention, self-billing), automates invoicing and fee splits, and manages the entire placement lifecycle from match to payment. Everything that normally requires trust, phone calls, and spreadsheets is handled by the platform.
Split Fee's answer:
UK recruitment agencies; from boutique firms with a handful of consultants to mid-sized agencies with specialist sector coverage. Any agency that has either strong candidates without the right vacancies, or client vacancies they can't fill from their own candidate pool. Split Fee turns those dormant assets into placements.
Split Fee's answer:
Abbie, our founder, knew that although split fee arrangements have existed in recruitment for decades, the process has always been manual: find a partner agency, negotiate terms, trust them with your candidate data, chase invoices. Most agencies avoid it because the overhead and risk outweigh the reward. Abbie built Split Fee to remove that friction entirely, with automated matching, progressive identity disclosure, built-in legal agreements, and automated billing, making split placements as straightforward as direct ones.
Based on our record, Yjs seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
In the architecture of my Collaborative-Code-Editor, choosing CRDTs over OT gives me the advantage of not depending on a server for my data conflicts. Using Yjs as my CRDT library, not only fixes the problems OT arises but comes with additional features. A unique identifier keeps track of the characters' identity, and relative addressing that points to the character position in my code editor. The relative... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Highly suggest you take a look here: https://github.com/yjs/yjs CRDT can absolutely do what youโre asking. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
``` Those commands create and move real files that immediately appear in the editor's file tree. The best part is that all of this works in both browser and server-side contexts, since yjs (https://github.com/yjs/yjs) is isomorphic. Under the hood, metadata (name, parent, timestamps) lives in a versioned CRDT table. Document content lives in a separate Y.Doc per file, so the directory index syncs without pulling... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Libraries like Automerge and Yjs have gone from academic curiosities to production-ready tools. They handle edge cases that would have made local-first apps unreliable five years ago. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
I really like these sorts of frameworks from an architectural perspective, but what's the use-case? Maybe I'm too SPA-pilled, because to me all the fun of Web development is in providing really fluid, skeuomorphic experiences like those enabled by, eg pragmatic-drag-and-drop[0] or yjs[1]. I just struggle to envision what application benefits from the efficiency that this or htmx offer, but from neither the... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
GUN - Self-hosted Firebase.
Unbench - Beyond recruitment, Unbench became a dynamic matchmaking platform, efficiently connecting companies with top specialists.
RxDB - A fast, offline-first, reactive Database for JavaScript Applications
Liveblocks - Build amazing realโtime collaborative products
Reflect.net - High-performance sync for multiplayer web apps. Up to 120 FPS sync, automatic persistence, server authority, fine-grained auth, and more...
Thymer - Web-based Project management and task planning for people who hate project management and task planning. For individuals, teams and small businesses.