Software Alternatives & Startups

xplr VS Code for Fun

Compare xplr VS Code for Fun and see what are their differences

xplr

Fast and hackable file manager for the terminal.

xplr Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Code for Fun

Code for fun offers coding programs, robotic and technology classes for kids.

Code for Fun Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, xplr seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 5 times since March 2021.

social mentions
5 vs 0
File Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
38 vs 17

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

xplr
Code for Fun
Website github.com codeforfun.com
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

xplr 5 features
Code for Fun 5 features
  • Customizability
    xplr offers a high level of customizability, allowing users to script and configure the file explorer extensively using Lua.
  • Terminal Integration
    As a terminal-based file explorer, xplr integrates well into a command-line workflow, making it convenient for users who prefer navigating files without leaving the terminal.
  • Lightweight
    xplr is designed to be a lightweight file explorer, ensuring quick start-up times and minimal system resource usage.
  • Keyboard Navigation
    It offers efficient keyboard navigation, which can improve productivity for users comfortable with keyboard shortcuts.
  • Cross-Platform
    xplr is a cross-platform application, making it accessible on various operating systems including Linux, macOS, and Windows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its customizability and keyboard-driven nature, xplr may have a steep learning curve for new users or those accustomed to GUI-based navigations.
  • Limited Default Features
    Out of the box, xplr might have fewer features compared to other more mature file explorers, requiring users to set up or script additional functionalities.
  • Dependency on Terminal
    As a terminal-based application, it requires users to have a terminal emulator, which may not be ideal for users who prefer graphical interfaces.
  • Potential for Overhead
    The extensive customization options might lead to increased overhead in managing configurations for users who need a simple, quick file explorer.
  • Community and Support
    While growing, xplr may not yet have as large of a community or as much available support compared to more established file explorers.
  • Engaging Curriculum
    Code for Fun offers an engaging curriculum designed to spark interest in coding among students, making learning enjoyable and effective.
  • Experienced Instructors
    The program boasts experienced instructors who are skilled at teaching coding in an accessible and understandable way for children and teens.
  • Wide Range of Courses
    Code for Fun provides a broad selection of courses catering to different ages and skill levels, from beginner to advanced programming topics.
  • Flexible Learning
    With options for online and in-person classes, Code for Fun offers flexible learning modalities to accommodate different learning preferences and schedules.
  • Focus on Creativity
    The program emphasizes creativity in coding, encouraging students to explore and develop their own projects, thereby enhancing their problem-solving skills.

Possible disadvantages

  • Costs
    The courses can be quite pricey, which may not be affordable for all families wishing to enroll their children in coding classes.
  • Limited Locations for In-Person Classes
    In-person classes may be limited to certain geographical locations, restricting accessibility for interested participants outside those areas.
  • Technology Requirements
    Participants need to have access to a computer and stable internet for online classes, which might be a barrier for some students.
  • Learning Pace
    The standardized pace of the courses may not suit all learners, as some students might require more time to grasp certain concepts.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

xplr 3 videos + Add
Code for Fun 0 videos + Add

SRAM XPLR Groupset Review: 1x Specific for Gravel Cycling

More videos

  • Review - Is This The Future Of Gravel? SRAM XPLR first ride impressions
  • Review - SRAM XPLR with Sage Storm King GP Review

No Code for Fun videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
xplr
Code for Fun
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using xplr and Code for Fun. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

xplr 5 mentions
Code for Fun 0 mentions
  • Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
    The Vim/Neovim ecosystem has gotten unbelievably better over the last 5-10 years. "Living in the terminal" for core development work is IMO better than pretty much anything else out there; my Neovim setup has a modern plugin manager; an... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • LF, NNN or ViFM?
    a terminal file manager built in rust I just heard about. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • how to rm -rf ~/Desktop permanently?
    I tried using nnn but didn't find it easy to adopt, now I'm looking at https://github.com/sayanarijit/xplr. Source: about 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Code for Fun since Jul 2021.

Alternatives to xplr and Code for Fun

When comparing xplr and Code for Fun, you can also consider the following products.