Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Working Copy VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare Working Copy VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

FieldLine.work
Dedicated tracking numbers, recorded & transcribed calls, and automatic lead capture for HVAC, plumbing & home-services crews. 7-day free trial. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Working Copy logo Working Copy

The powerful Git client for iOS

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.
  • Working Copy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

Working Copy features and specs

  • User Interface
    Working Copy features an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes navigating through repositories, committing changes, and pushing updates seamless even for beginners.
  • File Management
    It offers robust file management capabilities, allowing users to easily view, edit, and manage files directly within the app, a crucial feature for developers on the go.
  • Integration
    Working Copy integrates well with other iOS apps and services, enabling smooth workflow transitions between different tools and platforms.
  • Support for Multiple Repositories
    The app supports multiple repositories, which is beneficial for developers who work on various projects simultaneously.
  • Offline Capabilities
    Working Copy allows users to work offline with local repositories, syncing changes when back online, enabling productivity in environments without internet access.
  • SSH Key Management
    It includes robust SSH key management, ensuring secure and streamlined authentication for remote repository access.

Possible disadvantages of Working Copy

  • Cost
    While the basic features are free, some advanced functionalities require a paid subscription, which might be a drawback for budget-conscious users.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the abundance of features can be overwhelming for new users, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Limited Platform
    The app is available exclusively for iOS, which restricts accessibility for developers who use other platforms like Android or Windows.
  • Performance with Large Repositories
    Some users report performance issues when handling very large repositories, affecting the app's efficiency in such scenarios.
  • Editing Capabilities
    While it offers basic editing functionalities, Working Copy lacks some of the more advanced code editing features found in dedicated code editors.

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis of Working Copy

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Working Copy is considered a good app for developers who need a mobile solution for managing Git repositories. Its reliability and feature set make it a vital tool for those who prefer or need to work from iOS devices.

Why this product is good

  • Working Copy is highly regarded for its robust Git support on iOS devices, offering a wide range of features that facilitate efficient version control. It supports various Git operations like cloning, committing, pushing, and pulling straight from an iPhone or iPad. The app is praised for its intuitive user interface, seamless integration with cloud services, and its efficient use of device capabilities, making it a powerful tool for developers who need to manage their repositories on the go.

Recommended for

  • Developers who frequently work on Git repositories and need mobile access.
  • iOS users who require a robust version control tool.
  • Teams that collaborate on projects remotely and move between desktop and mobile environments.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Working Copy videos

+ Add

Using Git on iPad with Textastic and Working Copy

More videos:

  • Review - Obsidian: Capture on iOS with Drafts and Working Copy - Effective Remote Work

CrossBrowserTesting videos

+ Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison โ€“ LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Working Copy and CrossBrowserTesting)

Working Copy

CrossBrowserTesting

Git
100 100%
Git
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Working Copy and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Working Copy should be more popular than CrossBrowserTesting. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Working Copy mentions (18)

  • 37signals Introduces Once โ€“ One time payment software
    Even better is the licensing model where you can keep using the version as-is after the subscription ends. You just don't get any new features. It's even possible to do on iOS, as Working Copy [0] is doing it. (You also get all the bug fixes and stuff, only new features are behind a flag that requires you to purchase another year of updates. I would also argue that Working Copy specifically is too cheap, but I... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • How I set up an almost fully automatic free Sync between Win, Android, iOS using Git.
    Yeah, Working Copy is a proper Git front-end which helps do safe syncing, via features such as:. Source: over 3 years ago
  • [Newbie] How could I prevent git conflicts and make this system better?
    So I have a laptop and a iPhone. On laptop I have the Obsidian.md desktop app, on iPhone I have the app and Working Copy app too. This is all for syncing my notes. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Show HN: Jot: Rapid note management for the terminal, inspired by Obsidian
    > It uses the same format of storage as Obsidian... Can Obsidian and Jot co-mingle in the same vault? I use Obsidian and am very happy with the git plugin[0] and Working Copy(iOS)[1] for keeping things automatically synced between my phone and desktop(s). Often I find myself dumping notes into random places from the terminal; feeding markdown via pipes. But I then have to remember to collect these artifacts and... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • Are there any good git viewers/browsers for iOS?
    This is the only one I've heard people use: https://workingcopyapp.com/. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we donโ€™t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
  • How do yโ€™all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 5 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Working Copy and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products

CodeHub - CodeHub is the most complete, unofficial, client for GitHub on the iOS platform.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Git2Go - The Git client for iPhone and iPad you always wanted

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Diff So Fancy - Make Git diffs look good

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Loading...