WireGuard Reviews

0xProcessing Reviews

1. Barrie Grubb

   · Branch Manager at J & W Carpets · 15 days ago
   Easy to fit into our existing process

   We were looking for a way to accept crypto payments with no changes to the rest of our workflow. After reviewing payment gateways, 0xProcessing was deemed more feasible than others. The setup was simple and once it ran, never required day-to-day attention. The ability to create payment requests is hassle-free and clear for daily transaction uses; hence, there is no confusion.

   🏁 Competitors: CoinGate, RIZON

   👍 Pros:    Quick to get started|Supports multiple cryptocurrencies|Simple payment request|Clear transaction status

   👎 Cons:    More detailed reporting would be useful|Dashboard customization is limited
2. Cimin Cohen

   · Founder and CEO at Idea Peddler · 19 days ago
   The goal is to move BitPay in order to utilize it globally.

   Following numerous payment drops and unexpected compliance holds with BitPay, we switched our primary checkout flow to 0xProcessing. Our global clients rely on cross-border technology, services, and products. We needed a payment gateway that is used to handling payment processing and won’t raise flags about something this usual. Actually the onboarding as merchant was quite easy. The API integration into Vettrack’s custom billing stack has taken the dev team the best part of about two afternoons and the docs don’t leave much to the imagination.

   To run its day-to-day operations, Stable is used. We rely heavily on this payment links feature, which is completely automated. The VRCS feature converts incoming volatile assets to stablecoins automatically. The latter aspect alone has given adequate protection to our margins during the dips which get tied up in the afternoon. The 18 supported networks includes nearly everything our clients use. The processing time in so minimal, and we have still yet to have our first chargeback or false fraud flag since we started using it. The interface is effective but has glitches.

   🏁 Competitors: BitPay, CoinGate, RIZON, Coinbase

   👍 Pros:    Vrcs effectively mitigates market volatility risk|Supports a wide range of native tokens and|Transparent fee structure with no hidden billing surprises

   👎 Cons:    Ui dashboard feels overly basic for complex financial analysis|No native fiat payout options available
3. Ahsanul Hasan Amit

   · CEO and Founder at Dream Workers Tech · 21 days ago
   A practical option for making crypto payments on occasion.

   Since we don't usually process such payments, we weren’t looking for one that was equipped with many sophisticated tools. The first things were reliability and setup that shouldn’t be hard to get used to.

   After looking at a number of options Fireblocks included we found 0xProcessing easier to work with. The on-boarding process was simple and the documentation covered the majority of our needs. It has been doing its job with no additional work since implementation.

   🏁 Competitors: CoinGate, Fireblocks, BitPay

   👍 Pros:    Straightforward on-boarding|Supports several networks|Easy to understand pricing

   👎 Cons:    Limited analytics|Few dashboard customization options

WireGuard mentions (9)

• Remote access from work/corporate network

  Wireguard. Wireguard uses UDP only and runs TCP sockets over UDP. Source: about 3 years ago

• Central reverse-proxy ssh access?

  Look at Wireguard. I know you don't want Yet Another VPN running alongside your IPSec, but it's less VPN and more encrypted point-to-point UDP. You can set it up on any port you wish, including common ports that might be open on an outbound smart firewall not doing deep packet inspection. That way, it can stay out of the way of your existing IPSec deployment. Source: about 3 years ago

• Official /r/rust "Who's Hiring" thread for job-seekers and job-offerers [Rust 1.69]

  We use Elixir/Erlang for our control plane, and Rust for our data plane, built on the excellent WireGuard® tunneling protocol. Source: about 3 years ago

• Globally distributed Elixir over Tailscale

  Both products are based off Wireguard which is available for all new linux distributions. https://wireguard.com . I'm not saying OP's solution is wrong, just curious what the advantages are. Other than potentially simpler client setup, what are the advantages of paying for tailscale. With the opensource tailscale, I'm not sure if you get access to an api you can use to look up the hosts. Source: over 3 years ago

• Whisper: wraps any Go io.ReadWriter in a secure tunnel using Ed25519/X25519

  Noise Protocol Framework (used by Wireguard). Source: over 3 years ago

0xProcessing mentions (0)